Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 09:35:10 am

Author Topic: A second opinion on a Neap 2011 exam  (Read 659 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

My name aint bob

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 101
  • The crazed lurker of ATAR Notes
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2012
A second opinion on a Neap 2011 exam
« on: June 10, 2012, 06:57:05 pm »
0
Hey, i might just throw one more question at you guys, regarding Q2 of motion, in Neap 2011.

2kg remote control car, under constant driving force aceelerates from rest and reaches a constant speed after travelling 5m in a straight line. there is also a graph of Frictional force vs Distance, witch levels off at point (5m, 20N) (so that frictional force is from then on constant at 20N)

Q. Calculate the speed of the car when it has travelled 5m

the answer given did: change in KE= work done on car – work done to overcome friction, and then found the area under the graph. and approached it that way.

However i did v^2= u^2 + 2ax, and found an average of acceleration by adding 10 and zero and deviding by two (10 becouse at 0m, a=F(net)/mass =20-2)

Hopefully this hasn't come out massively confusing, does anyone know if this is a valid approach
2011: Biology [35 --->36]
2012 raw aims: english[30] Chemistry[35] methods[35] further [45] physics:[35]

"Damn girl.. I loved the way you moved dat bishop"

max payne

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 318
  • Respect: +22
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: A second opinion on a Neap 2011 exam
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2012, 10:33:10 pm »
0
That's what I did!!! :D
And I thought that was more accurate then their approach to be honest. I think it was still within one decimal point from their answer so you should still get the mark

My name aint bob

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 101
  • The crazed lurker of ATAR Notes
  • Respect: +4
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: A second opinion on a Neap 2011 exam
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2012, 10:19:49 am »
0
yeah i thought so aswell. I was off by .5, so i just took off one mark for the hell of it :P

anyways im glad im not the only one,  i think its more accurate as-well.
2011: Biology [35 --->36]
2012 raw aims: english[30] Chemistry[35] methods[35] further [45] physics:[35]

"Damn girl.. I loved the way you moved dat bishop"