Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 12:42:59 pm

Author Topic: Please check my respose for :2011 VCAA/sectionB/Q3/c/ii  (Read 574 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

VCE_2012

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 222
  • Respect: 0
Please check my respose for :2011 VCAA/sectionB/Q3/c/ii
« on: June 10, 2012, 10:22:44 pm »
0
"The sample of the espresso coffee should be diluted enough so it's peak area is contained within the range of the calibration curve."

I'm a bit edgy because it's usually "diluted enough so its concentration" but in this case there was peak area and that is what I used. So would I still get a mark?

ligands

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 298
  • Respect: +24
  • School: catholic college bendigo
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Please check my respose for :2011 VCAA/sectionB/Q3/c/ii
« Reply #1 on: June 10, 2012, 10:25:30 pm »
0
I'd you didn't mention the peak area you don't get a mark

charmanderp

  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3209
  • Respect: +305
  • School Grad Year: 2012
Re: Please check my respose for :2011 VCAA/sectionB/Q3/c/ii
« Reply #2 on: June 10, 2012, 10:35:29 pm »
0
You'd have to either state the minimum dilution factor or say 'dilute so that the peak area of the expresso peak fits within the range accounted for by the calibration curve.'
University of Melbourne - Bachelor of Arts majoring in English, Economics and International Studies (2013 onwards)

t35t

  • New South Welsh
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 85
  • Respect: 0
  • School: Penola Catholic College
Re: Please check my respose for :2011 VCAA/sectionB/Q3/c/ii
« Reply #3 on: June 10, 2012, 10:47:54 pm »
0
"The sample of the espresso coffee should be diluted enough so it's peak area is contained within the range of the calibration curve."

I'm a bit edgy because it's usually "diluted enough so its concentration" but in this case there was peak area and that is what I used. So would I still get a mark?

I think it's right. The essence of the question was mentioning that it had to be diluted so that it would fit the calibration curve no? Plus, the marking scheme specified "dilution" AND "dilution by a factor of..." - the reason why both these points is mentioned was because some students wrote "by a dilution factor <12", in which case it would still not fit the calibration curve. Just like the marking scheme in biology, sometimes *not* overcomplicating it reduces the chances of making a mistake.... and isn't what you said essentially the same as what the examiner report outlined?