Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

September 18, 2025, 08:05:34 am

Author Topic: electronics  (Read 4289 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

evaporade

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 111
  • Respect: +1
electronics
« on: May 02, 2009, 10:19:06 pm »
0


TonyHem

  • Guest
Re: electronics
« Reply #1 on: May 02, 2009, 10:54:46 pm »
0
my guess is zero :)

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: electronics
« Reply #2 on: May 02, 2009, 11:32:59 pm »
0
I think is 6V and the rest are 0V, but not sure.

Damo17

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +8
Re: electronics
« Reply #3 on: May 02, 2009, 11:58:48 pm »
0
I would say 6v across v3 as well and 0v across v1 and v2.
My explanation:
The reversed bias diode would have an extremely high resistance. It would let a very small amount of current through, micro amps, thus it would take all the voltage being put into the circuit. 
2011: Science - ANU

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: electronics
« Reply #4 on: May 03, 2009, 12:00:38 am »
0
I think is 6V and the rest are 0V, but not sure.
was saying the same as that with tonyhem on msn.

But I'm not 100% sure...
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: electronics
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2009, 12:36:21 am »
0
I would say 6v across v3 as well and 0v across v1 and v2.
My explanation:
The reversed bias diode would have an extremely high resistance. It would let a very small amount of current through, micro amps, thus it would take all the voltage being put into the circuit. 


Ah that's why

My teacher was explaining to the class that there was no current in the circuit. But how would this account for the voltage drop across the reverse diode?
So there must be current in the circuit after all.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: electronics
« Reply #6 on: May 03, 2009, 12:37:26 am »
0
I would say 6v across v3 as well and 0v across v1 and v2.
My explanation:
The reversed bias diode would have an extremely high resistance. It would let a very small amount of current through, micro amps, thus it would take all the voltage being put into the circuit. 


Ah that's why

My teacher was explaining to the class that there was no current in the circuit. But how would this account for the voltage drop across the reverse diode?
So there must be current in the circuit after all.
in Jarcaranda it says the circuit has very LITTLE current, so I assume there is still current, but just very very small...
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Damo17

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +8
Re: electronics
« Reply #7 on: May 03, 2009, 01:01:18 am »
0
yeah there is still current, I think I read that it was as small as micro amps.
If a reverse-biasing voltage is applied across the P-N junction, the depletion region expands, further resisting any current through it. Key word here is 'resisting', it does not completely stop all current just makes it harder for current to flow as the depletion region gets larger.
2011: Science - ANU

naved_s9994

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1412
  • Respect: +15
Re: electronics
« Reply #8 on: May 03, 2009, 04:23:38 pm »
0
It will be zero for all for SURE... Guys, its a SERIES?? !!

'Keep you friends close, but keep your enemies closer'

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: electronics
« Reply #9 on: May 03, 2009, 10:51:26 pm »
0
Hello again evaporade...
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

kurrymuncher

  • Guest
Re: electronics
« Reply #10 on: May 03, 2009, 10:53:27 pm »
0
im confused

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: electronics
« Reply #11 on: May 03, 2009, 11:02:28 pm »
0
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

TonyHem

  • Guest
Re: electronics
« Reply #12 on: May 03, 2009, 11:36:00 pm »
0
Lol@argument!!!

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: electronics
« Reply #13 on: May 04, 2009, 03:38:57 pm »
0
(Image removed from quote.)

I've confirmed.

V1 is 0
V2 is 0
V3 is 6V

basically the reverse bias allows no current in the circuit (There might be some, but let's assume it is a perfect diode and blocks out all current)

using Ohms law on the resistor we have V = IR when I is 0 there is 0 V

for the forward bias diode we can not use ohms law as it does not have a linear relationship.

Looking at the graph of a diode, we are only dealing with the positive half of the graph (Since forward bias implies positive and reverse bias implies negative)

when I is 0 we see that V = 0 Hence V2 = 0

However at V3 we see its a reverse bias diode, again looking back at diode graph, we are only dealing with the negative half. Since the battery is 6V and when I = 0, the voltage can be anything for the reverse diode, so the potential difference is 6 V.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: electronics
« Reply #14 on: May 04, 2009, 07:33:47 pm »
0
TT: the only way to confirm something like this is to construct the circuit and experimentally test it out.

A diode has a forward voltage as well as a reverse voltage (usually excluded as it almost always lead to permanent damage to it). I'm not sure if 6V is enough to kill the diode in reverse bias, but if it is, there will be some interesting complications.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015