Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 08, 2025, 04:10:35 am

Author Topic: Catalysts  (Read 1103 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

pHysiX

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
  • RAWRRRRRR!
  • Respect: +2
  • School: Wellington Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2009
Catalysts
« on: May 07, 2009, 07:47:54 pm »
0
I have just a simple question.

In the reaction of salicylic acid and ethanoic anhydride, sulfuric acid is added. This is a catalyst and is not a reactant.

My question is:
How do we prove that it is a catalyst?

I was thinking of reacting the salicylic acid and ethanoic anhydride normally and note the time for the reaction to be complete.

Thanks heaps in advance =]
2010: BBiomedSC/LLB
2011: BE (ECSE)/LLB

2011: Dean's Honours (Engineering)
2012: Dean's Honours (Engineering)

"Hey sweety! I love you like e^x"
"Always exponentially increasing and never equal to zero"
<3

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Catalysts
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2009, 07:50:29 pm »
0


I was thinking of reacting the salicylic acid and ethanoic anhydride normally and note the time for the reaction to be complete.

You are thinking exactly the same thing as me atm. LOL
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

iamdan08

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 697
  • VCE Survivor
  • Respect: +7
Re: Catalysts
« Reply #2 on: May 07, 2009, 08:07:34 pm »
0
...and perhaps that it is not consumed in the reaction.
2007-08 VCE - Accounting, Texts & Traditions, Methods, Chem, Physics, Lit
         
2011 Bachelor of Biomedicine (Completed) @ The University of Melbourne
2012 Doctor of Medicine (Second Year) @ The University of Melbourne

iamdan08

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 697
  • VCE Survivor
  • Respect: +7
Re: Catalysts
« Reply #3 on: May 07, 2009, 09:05:16 pm »
0
Another way you could further prove it was a catalyst is that the change in enthalpy of the reaction would be the same, since catalysts only affect the activation energy. You could measure this by measuring the energy released before and after it was added.
2007-08 VCE - Accounting, Texts & Traditions, Methods, Chem, Physics, Lit
         
2011 Bachelor of Biomedicine (Completed) @ The University of Melbourne
2012 Doctor of Medicine (Second Year) @ The University of Melbourne

Gloamglozer

  • The Walking VTAC Guide
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4170
  • Here to listen and help
  • Respect: +324
Re: Catalysts
« Reply #4 on: May 08, 2009, 10:16:09 pm »
0
I think you can prove it was a catalyst by titrating the catalyst.  Don't quote me on it but I'm just putting it out there on the table.

Bachelor of Science (Mathematics & Statistics) - Discrete Mathematics & Operations Research

pHysiX

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
  • RAWRRRRRR!
  • Respect: +2
  • School: Wellington Secondary College
  • School Grad Year: 2009
Re: Catalysts
« Reply #5 on: May 09, 2009, 07:43:52 pm »
0
i've talked to a few people and i think the best way is to:

do the reaction without catalyst and note the time.
then we can do a titration to verify the amount of catalyst in the solution.

thanks guys for the help =]
2010: BBiomedSC/LLB
2011: BE (ECSE)/LLB

2011: Dean's Honours (Engineering)
2012: Dean's Honours (Engineering)

"Hey sweety! I love you like e^x"
"Always exponentially increasing and never equal to zero"
<3