Let's consider the consequences of stating that the velocity is
You've neglected to mention the information given by in the direction of the i and j unit vectors.
You're assuming that the rocket only moves up. What if later, a force were to act on the rocket? In that case, if we assumed that the velocity was just
 = 6\mathbf k)
, then we'd be ignoring that the velocity vector is actually on a bit of an angle.
Also another somewhat abstract idea is that the direction of velocity, acceleration and displacement can be distinct. You could be moving up, but have a negative velocity at that point in time. You could be moving upwards, but have a velocity that's pointing in more of a south easterly direction. Or in this case we have a vector that points
 = 3\mathbf{i} + 5\mathbf{j} + 6\mathbf{k})
 = 3\mathbf{i} + 5\mathbf{j} + (10 - t^2)\mathbf{k})
is the function that describes the rocket's velocity at any time.
If we take the indefinite integral of this, you could come up with a function that describes it's displacement. Or if you differentiate this, you can come up with a function that describes it's acceleration. You might find it handy to plot the various vectors you get for each point in time (take a look at say, t = 0 to t = 5) and see how the various 'properties' of this rocket's motion changes with time. Drawing out things like that for a few scenarios might make it easier for you to visualise the affect velocity can have on an object's motion .