Sorry about the bad phrasing.
What I wanted to ask was why is the gradient steep in some places and gentle in other places. Or why isn't the change in pH linear.
Thanks.
I'm fairly sure its to do with pH being a log, but we are looking at a graph with a linear scale.
http://www.scienceforums.net/topic/15586-ph-titration-curves/ See the third post.
So I've got a question related to a titration between iron ions (fe2+) and pottasium permanganate.
One of the questions in the prac book (which for the life of me I can't think of an adequate answer) is:
5. The amount of additional potassium permanganate solution required to reach the endpoint is minute. This excess will notionally increase the calculated amount of iron present but, in practice, the extra has no effect on the calculated amount. Why not?
I'm really stumped on this one.
Also, another question asks: In most titration exercises, the titres are averaged before doing the calculations. Why is this
inappropriate in this exercise?
Thanks for helping out!
For the first part, we can't know how many drops over the equivalence point we have gone to reach the endpoint (if we did, why not just use the equivalence point titre, rather than the end point!), so we cannot accurately account for the few drops in our calculations. In turn, we have to assume that the endpoint equals the equivalence point, otherwise we can't do our calculations! This is why choosing an appropriate indicator to decrease this difference is essential.
For the second without seeing the results, I would assume that they are not concordant.