Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 11:36:22 am

Author Topic: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread  (Read 448755 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

thushan

  • ATAR Notes Lecturer
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4959
  • Respect: +626
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #420 on: February 10, 2013, 11:17:33 pm »
+1
Ques:  A hydrocarbon on complete combustion gives a mass of carbon dioxide which is 20/9 times greater than the mass of water produced.  What is the empirical formula of the hydrocarbon?


Assume that 9 g of water is produced and 20 grams of CO2 is produced. Go from there :)
Managing Director  and Senior Content Developer - Decode Publishing (2020+)
http://www.decodeguides.com.au

Basic Physician Trainee - Monash Health (2019-)
Medical Intern - Alfred Hospital (2018)
MBBS (Hons.) - Monash Uni
BMedSci (Hons.) - Monash Uni

Former ATARNotes Lecturer for Chemistry, Biology

LOLs99

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1142
  • Respect: +7
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #421 on: February 12, 2013, 12:31:14 am »
0
I'm not sure. Do u just find the moles? I got C11H10..
2014-2016: 

2017-2018: Master of Engineering

Bad Student

  • Guest
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #422 on: February 12, 2013, 07:38:34 pm »
0
Is the answer ?

Working out in the spoiler
Spoiler






Jeggz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Respect: +42
  • School: Presbyterian Ladies' College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #423 on: February 12, 2013, 08:18:30 pm »
0
aaghh?!
I'm getting C5H11?  :o
Melbourne University - Commerce; Actuarial Studies.

Tutoring 2015 - Email/PM for places!

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #424 on: February 12, 2013, 08:25:00 pm »
+1
Working out in the spoiler
Spoiler






Sorry mate, second line isn't to enough decimal places.

Bad Student

  • Guest
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #425 on: February 12, 2013, 08:31:26 pm »
0
Sorry mate, second line isn't to enough decimal places.

Damn, I always make that mistake.

Jeggz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Respect: +42
  • School: Presbyterian Ladies' College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #426 on: February 12, 2013, 08:35:03 pm »
0
hold on..so what exactly is the answer guys?  :o
Melbourne University - Commerce; Actuarial Studies.

Tutoring 2015 - Email/PM for places!

Mr Keshy

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1557
  • Get in my Beamer Benz or Bentley
  • Respect: +68
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #427 on: February 12, 2013, 08:43:47 pm »
0
I got C9H10, did exactly what bad student did except multiple mole of h20 by 2.

Why did you do that btw? :)
Please... Call me Kesh

Subjects

English, Physics, Chemistry, Methods, Further, Business

Jeggz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Respect: +42
  • School: Presbyterian Ladies' College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #428 on: February 12, 2013, 08:45:34 pm »
0
I got C9H10, did exactly what bad student did except multiple mole of h20 by 2.

Why did you do that btw? :)

But we know that the C:H ratio is 5/11 : 1 right? and so you would multiply by it by 11?
or am i just doing something completely and utterly stupid here?  ???
Melbourne University - Commerce; Actuarial Studies.

Tutoring 2015 - Email/PM for places!

Bad Student

  • Guest
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #429 on: February 12, 2013, 08:47:18 pm »
+1
I got C9H10, did exactly what bad student did except multiple mole of h20 by 2.

Why did you do that btw? :)

The information provided allows you to find the number of mole of water, but there are two hydrogen atoms in water so I multiplied it by two.

Also, if the formula is C9H10, you're left with lots of carbon atoms that don't have their bonds occupied. (not sure if that's the right terminology)
« Last Edit: February 12, 2013, 08:50:17 pm by Bad Student »

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #430 on: February 12, 2013, 08:48:10 pm »
+3
Bad Student's working looks fine to me. Whether they wanted people to simplify 0.45 as 0.5 or keep it as 5/11 is another matter. Personally I'd have Machi's answer.

I got C9H10, did exactly what bad student did except multiple mole of h20 by 2.

Why did you do that btw? :)

Because each water molecule has 2 hydrogen atoms and hence you must multiply it by two to get the n(H) :)

Daenerys Targaryen

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 606
  • Aka HatersGonnaHate
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #431 on: February 12, 2013, 08:55:15 pm »
+2
It would have to be because isn't a alkane, alkene, alkyne. Or can it be a hydrocarbon still despite those three categories?
I am Daenerys Stormborn of House Targaryen, the Unburnt, Mother of Dragons, Khaleesi to Drogo's riders, and queen of the Seven Kingdoms of Westeros
2012: Further | Biology
2013: Methods | Specialist | English | Chemistry | Japanese
ATAR: 97.20

teletubbies_95

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 691
  • heartbreaker <3 JB
  • Respect: +24
  • School: Mac.Rob
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #432 on: February 12, 2013, 08:57:42 pm »
0
After much confusion, I got the same answer as BadStudent! Is that right?
It cant be C9H10 or C5H11, as it doesnt match the general formulas for alkane, alkene and alkynes ! :)

Btw. Great question! :)
« Last Edit: February 12, 2013, 08:59:49 pm by teletubbies_95 »
2012: Psychology(46) Biology (44)
2013: Chem(41)---EngLang(44)--HealthnHuman(47)---Methods(41)--DEAKIN PSYCH(4.5)
ATAR=99.10! :) umat=94ile
i liek lala :) arre bhaiya aal izz well :) <3

Mr Keshy

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1557
  • Get in my Beamer Benz or Bentley
  • Respect: +68
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #433 on: February 12, 2013, 09:01:32 pm »
0
Ahhh okay, dunno what I was thinking!
Please... Call me Kesh

Subjects

English, Physics, Chemistry, Methods, Further, Business

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #434 on: February 12, 2013, 09:02:19 pm »
0
It would have to be because isn't a alkane, alkene, alkyne. Or can it be a hydrocarbon still despite those three categories?

There are other hydrocarbons, C5H11 would probably have a positive charge on it iirc. It's quite ambiguous.

Btw. Great question! :)


In all respect, I actually disagree, it's a question with quite an ambiguous answer despite the working being fairly straightforward (in comparison to other harder stoich questions).