Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 11:41:23 am

Author Topic: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread  (Read 448756 times)  Share 

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Mr Keshy

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1557
  • Get in my Beamer Benz or Bentley
  • Respect: +68
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #660 on: March 27, 2013, 02:16:21 pm »
0
Went really really really bad on my first Chem SAC. Did not expect it at all. Teacher still has high hopes though :)
« Last Edit: March 27, 2013, 06:26:02 pm by Machan »
Please... Call me Kesh

Subjects

English, Physics, Chemistry, Methods, Further, Business

Jeggz

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 493
  • Respect: +42
  • School: Presbyterian Ladies' College
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #661 on: March 27, 2013, 06:26:18 pm »
0
Oh dear! What happened?  :(
Melbourne University - Commerce; Actuarial Studies.

Tutoring 2015 - Email/PM for places!

hungover

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Respect: -13
  • School: The School For Excellence - [not TSFX]
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #662 on: March 27, 2013, 06:58:53 pm »
+1
on my first chem SAC i got 31/35. could have got that full 35 (only made silly mistakes) but we only had 45 minutes of time, many students didnt even finish. I am still happy as i am the RANK 1.
2012: [37]Biology [40]Further
2013: [35]English [>48]Biology [30]Methods [37]Chemistry [>45]Physics [50]Further

PLEASE GOD GIVE ME THE STRENGTH TO GET INTO MEDICINE

Mr Keshy

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1557
  • Get in my Beamer Benz or Bentley
  • Respect: +68
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #663 on: March 27, 2013, 08:36:05 pm »
0
Just a huge mind blank, and misunderstandings really. My teacher didn't seem disappointed but just told me ways I can improve (ie do more questions etc..). Awesome teacher!

It does suck a bit since this was a rather large SAC too!
Please... Call me Kesh

Subjects

English, Physics, Chemistry, Methods, Further, Business

hungover

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 25
  • Respect: -13
  • School: The School For Excellence - [not TSFX]
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #664 on: March 27, 2013, 09:19:46 pm »
0
ours was quite long as well. most people got 18-21.
2012: [37]Biology [40]Further
2013: [35]English [>48]Biology [30]Methods [37]Chemistry [>45]Physics [50]Further

PLEASE GOD GIVE ME THE STRENGTH TO GET INTO MEDICINE

Edward21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 625
  • Don't ask me, all I do is calculate pH.
  • Respect: +27
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #665 on: March 27, 2013, 11:50:21 pm »
0
Standard Question: basically AAS of Pb in mussels, max allowance is 2.5ppm, there's a 1.50g sample, made up to 100mL, and through the calibration curve a value of 2.5ug/L, what is the ppm?

If there's 2.5ug/L, then X10^-6 = 2.5X10^-6g/L, but there's only 100mL so multiply by 0.1L = 2.5X10^-7g of Pb in 1.50g

I know there's a ppm formula: g of solute/g total solution X 1,000,000 so 2.5X10^-7g/1.50g X 1,000,000 = 0.17 ppm??? is that right?  :-[
2012 Biology [44] 2013 Chemistry [50] Italian [38] English [48] Health & HD [45] Methods [34] ATAR: 99.10

2014-2016 Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne


Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #666 on: April 01, 2013, 07:09:08 pm »
0


My teacher gave us this worksheet for the holidays but didn't provide us with any solutions. :P I'd really appreciate it if someone could do these so I can check my work. :)
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

Limista

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 944
  • Respect: +63
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #667 on: April 01, 2013, 07:25:03 pm »
+1
Standard Question: basically AAS of Pb in mussels, max allowance is 2.5ppm, there's a 1.50g sample, made up to 100mL, and through the calibration curve a value of 2.5ug/L, what is the ppm?

If there's 2.5ug/L, then X10^-6 = 2.5X10^-6g/L, but there's only 100mL so multiply by 0.1L = 2.5X10^-7g of Pb in 1.50g

I know there's a ppm formula: g of solute/g total solution X 1,000,000 so 2.5X10^-7g/1.50g X 1,000,000 = 0.17 ppm??? is that right?  :-[

Yeah that's what I got too!

But I didn't know that a ppm formula existed, nor do I believe one needs to use it. So what I did was pretty much the same as you:

m(undiluted extract) = 2.5 x 0.1 = 0.25ug = 0.25 x 10^(-6) g
 1.5g has 0.25 x 10^(-6) g
 10^6g has (0.25 x 10^(-6) x 10^6)/1.5 = 0.17ppm (w/w)
Bachelor of Biomedicine @ The University of Melbourne (II) 2014-2016
Follow me on my blog

Cappuccinos

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 125
  • Respect: +22
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #668 on: April 01, 2013, 08:33:11 pm »
+3
(Image removed from quote.)

My teacher gave us this worksheet for the holidays but didn't provide us with any solutions. :P I'd really appreciate it if someone could do these so I can check my work. :)

disclaimer:Bit rusty, so there could be mistakes
Q1
a) 0.15 ppm (approximately, guessing the gradient on the line is 0.3)

b) Dilulation factor = 500/5 = 100
    Therefore [Na+] in body fluid = 0.15ppm x 100 = 15 ppm

c) 15 ppm = 15 g Na+ in 1,000,000 ml of body fluid
     Hence in 1000mL (1L) = 1000/1,000,000  x 15g
     = 1.5 x 10^-2 g/L
     = 15mg/L
     No, contains 15 mg/L which is less than 319.7mg/L

Q2
a) 0.66 ppm (from graph again)

b) Dilulation factor = 500/5 = 100
    Therefore [Na+] in body fluid = 0.66ppm x 100 = 66 ppm

c) 66 ppm = 66g Na+ in 1,000,000 ml of body fluid
     Hence in 1000mL (1L) = 1000/1,000,000  x 66g
     = 6.6 x 10^-2 g/L
     = 66mg/L
     No, contains 66 mg/L which is  less than 253 mg/L

d)  In 0.4mL of body fluids = 0.4/1,000,000 x 66ppm
     = 2.6 x 10^-5 g in 0.4mL of  body fluid
     = 26 μg in 0.4mL of body fluid

Q3) 
a) Maximum mecury allowed in fish = 500 ppm (w/w)  i.e 500 g in 1,000,000 g of fish
Hence in 200 g = 200/1,000,000 x 500g
           = 0.1g

b) 0.4ppm (off the graph)

c) Dilution factor = 4
    Therefore [Hg] in fish = 0.4ppm x 4
     =2 ppm

d) 2 ppm = 2g in 1,000,000, g
    Hence in whole fish (200g)  = 200/1,000,000  x 2
    = 0.04 g
     Which is less than 0.1g, so yes it is safe to eat.

Stick

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3774
  • Sticky. :P
  • Respect: +467
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #669 on: April 01, 2013, 09:40:30 pm »
0
I got a different answer for the very last question: 0.0004g. I think it's just a typo on your part since your arithmetic is correct. :P Thanks so much for taking the time to do that for me. :)
2017-2020: Doctor of Medicine - The University of Melbourne
2014-2016: Bachelor of Biomedicine - The University of Melbourne

tae

  • Victorian
  • Trailblazer
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Respect: 0
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #670 on: April 03, 2013, 11:26:46 am »
0


Can someone please help? :)
Need help with c. ii.
2012: religion & society
2013: english / health & human dev / chemistry / methods / further
2014: arts/business @ monash

Limista

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 944
  • Respect: +63
  • School Grad Year: 2013
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #671 on: April 03, 2013, 11:36:05 am »
+1
c. i) 400mg/L

c. ii) There have been a total of 2 dilutions. When extract dissolved in nitric acid, this does not count as a dilution.

Concentration of sample after 1st dilution = 400 x (100/25) = 1600mg/L

Mass of undiluted extract = 1600 x 0.5 = 800mg = 0.8g

Percentage purity of copper in anode = 0.8/0.855 x 100% = 93.6% (w/w)
Bachelor of Biomedicine @ The University of Melbourne (II) 2014-2016
Follow me on my blog

Homer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
  • Respect: +10
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #672 on: April 03, 2013, 06:59:15 pm »
0
how would i name and draw (CH3)2CHCH2CH3
Bachelor of Laws/Engineering

2013 ATAR: 98.65

Specialist Maths [53.06] Maths Methods [48.83] Physics [48.22]

Donuts. Is there anything they can't do?

jgoudie

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 138
  • Chemisode: an app for studying chemistry
  • Respect: +3
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #673 on: April 03, 2013, 08:08:57 pm »
+1
CH3
       \
        CH-CH2-CH3
       /
CH3

Naming:
Longest chain is a 4 chain hydrocarbon  (butane)
there is a is a methyl group (CH3) coming of the second carbon in it however this is the only possible carbon that can come off therefor the number is not needed.
-- Methyl Butane.


It would be better to draw bonds to each of the hydrogen also.
how would i name and draw (CH3)2CHCH2CH3
Chemisode: A podcast, iPhone/iPad app for studying VCE chemistry.

Search the appstore: "Chemisode"
http://www.facebook/chemisode34
http://www.facebook/chemisode12
http://jgoudie.podomatic.com/
http://www.youtube.com/mrjasongoudie
Iphone and Ipad apps: 'Chemisode' out in the app store now!

Homer

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 431
  • Respect: +10
Re: Chemistry 3/4 2013 Thread
« Reply #674 on: April 03, 2013, 09:15:02 pm »
0
perfect thanks :)
Bachelor of Laws/Engineering

2013 ATAR: 98.65

Specialist Maths [53.06] Maths Methods [48.83] Physics [48.22]

Donuts. Is there anything they can't do?