Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 08, 2025, 07:00:20 am

Author Topic: Systematic name?  (Read 2687 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

lzxnl

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3432
  • Respect: +215
Re: Systematic name?
« Reply #15 on: April 08, 2013, 10:46:16 pm »
+2
Actually, amines are quite low on the priority list, even lower than alcohols, which are in turn lower than the aldehyde and ketone groups with one double bond to an oxygen. Carboxylic acid groups have two oxygens AND a double bond. They are almost ALWAYS the highest priority. I do not actually know of a functional group with higher priority.
2012
Mathematical Methods (50) Chinese SL (45~52)

2013
English Language (50) Chemistry (50) Specialist Mathematics (49~54.9) Physics (49) UMEP Physics (96%) ATAR 99.95

2014-2016: University of Melbourne, Bachelor of Science, Diploma in Mathematical Sciences (Applied Maths)

2017-2018: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics)

2019-2024: PhD, MIT (Applied Mathematics)

Accepting students for VCE tutoring in Maths Methods, Specialist Maths and Physics! (and university maths/physics too) PM for more details

saba.ay

  • Guest
Re: Systematic name?
« Reply #16 on: April 08, 2013, 11:25:53 pm »
0
Actually, amines are quite low on the priority list, even lower than alcohols, which are in turn lower than the aldehyde and ketone groups with one double bond to an oxygen. Carboxylic acid groups have two oxygens AND a double bond. They are almost ALWAYS the highest priority. I do not actually know of a functional group with higher priority.

Thank you! Just looked this up now, and yes, amines are pretty far down in the order of precedence. I was using notes that my teacher had made and it had NH2 listed as the highest- probably a mistake/typo or something, but should let her know before it confuses anyone further. :/

Seriously, thank you so much for this! :D Probably would have made this mistake, had it come up in a SAC/exam!