Uni Stuff > University Results Discussion
[UoM] 2013 Semester 1 Results Thread
simpak:
Well, I'd say people tend to stick in their own areas, so probably not? Like, depending on what you apply for.
Alternatively, I have friends who get ~90 on their Arts assessments, you just have to get good at writing for university.
Hancock:
Probably gonna piss some people off, but I reckon that a 95 in a humanities subject outweighs a 95 in an engineering subject because of the subjectivity of the marking scheme.
edit: spelling
simpak:
Obviously, speaking from a wide background haha, it is easier to get very, very high marks in Science subjects than it is in Arts subjects. But I don't think it's easier to get a H1. Just more likely that you would get more low H1s in Arts putting in the same amount of work to get a high H1 in Science.
tonychet2:
accounting reports and analysis: 73
introductory microeconomics: 80
quantitative methods 1: 72
calculus 1: 50 LOL
damn you guys are pro! motivation to work harder next semester :P
LeviLamp:
EVERYONE I KNOW (INCLUDING MYSELF) DID BADLY IN CALCULUS 1 TONYCHET IT'S NOT A BAD SCORE
Seriously, I wonder why they didn't scale marks up at all given the enormous number of P and F-boundary students.
It seems a bit mean to blame the students when the exam was so awfully cruel in comparison to all the set questions/lecture note examples/everything we were provided with. :')
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version