Summary:
-TT does every question in the book and is adamant he didn't waste time doing so
-/0 doesn't do every question in the book and is adamant he doesn't need to
That's the way all these arguments go.
I started doing every question in the book but stopped because I realised it wasn't helping me too much (MathsQuest

). So I just quickly did the set questions and read through all the other questions, if I saw a question that I didn't instantly see the solution I did that too. That should be generally OK. I do Essentials now

Just doing the questions that seem to be possible problem-causers and the chapter reviews.
But in general I agree with /0 on this. I feel you will get a reward for doing every question in the book, but it is less than the reward you could get from spending that exact amount of time for extra questions from practice exams. But on the other hand, at this stage of the year I'm not sure whether many people have done 10-20 trial exams for spesh. In that sense, during Terms 1 and 2 where your focus is on understanding the concepts and doing the textbook, if you finish every question in the textbook then you can only benefit. Because if person A has finished every question in the textbook and person B has finished the set questions + a few trial exams, then I would say person B probably has better used their first semester, but if person A has finished every question in the textbook and person B has finished the set questions only...and both of them will be doing trial exams next semester, then in terms of spesh alone person A probably is better off (assuming equal mathematical talent, all other variables kept constant).
Just my two cents
