Uni Stuff > Law

Notes for cases

<< < (2/2)

vashappenin:
Bump?

Rohmer:
The principle IS the ratio - the reason for the decision, e.g. the principle in Foakes v Beer [1884] is that part payment of a debt does not constitute good consideration due to the existing legal duty rule. Or in Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd, 'the display of a product in a store with a price attached is not sufficient to be considered an offer, but rather is an invitation to treat' etc.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page

Go to full version