Hi Elyse, I have my textual evidence and some broad concepts about discovery, but I was wondering if you could just see if this thesis makes sense? I think i'm going slightly crazy from too much english, and just need a new perspective haha! P.S I'm doing The Motorcycle Diaries and The Apology
Thesis: The dynamic nature of discovery means it is largely an ongoing process of suppositions seeking validation.
This is a really unique thesis because it makes the discovery focused on beliefs being challenged or validated. As long as this is a common thing that flows through your prescribed and related text, there's no problem. But, you need to be prepared to make a complimentary thesis statement on the spot in an exam. I used this technique. My introduction opened with two thesis statements that complimented each other - one was my prepared thesis (like you have) and the second one was a direct response to the question. The wording of my prepared thesis changed to adapt to the question more.
I think your thesis is limited in the expression. Currently, you're implying that discovery is mainly about beliefs being challenged. If this is the only main idea you want to flesh out in your response, then that's fine. But if you want to give yourself more scope, you might have to adjust the expression to incorporate the effects of these suppositions being validated, or how that impacts on people's relationships, or how it offers renewed perspectives, etc, etc. If you're comfortable with your supporting thesis to do this work for you, then that's cool too. But if I were you, I'd be teasing out the expression of that sentence a bit more to encourage that wider scope for the different stages and elements of discovery.