Thank you so much! I put it on google drive, hopefully this link works! There first page is there twice so just ignore that.
The question was: "Discovery is a process of questions and potential answers. To what extent has this process been represented in your prescribed text and texts of your own choosing?" It was written under timed conditions (40 minutes).
https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BzRjW7wFcvb4RjB5c3BLWmMtT2s/view?usp=sharing
Hey Beth! The link works, and I'll pop comments on each paragraph here as I go!
Note: Resolution issues mean I'm having the slightest trouble reading your handwriting. Won't impact your HSC marking but it could mean I miss the odd point, keep that in mind if something I say seems off
IntroductionI think your conceptual set up here works well! Concepts are well explained, but I'd question whether you are adequately addressing the question concepts; "questions and potential answers." Not getting too much explanation of that. I'd also like to see you properly link each text to a Discovery concept, just using one phrase should do it. That's just to set up WHY these texts are being discussed in a Discovery essay. Finally, I'd add a sentence at the end that brings together everything. Like, "Thus, we can see how composers represent Discovery, blah blah blah."
Paragraph #1Awesome topic sentence; conceptual and to the point, absolutely fabulous. Analysis of Shakespeare is somewhat effective, excellent integration of your quotes into your writing, but I'd like to see one more technique given that it is your prescribed text. On the whole, watch that you aren't saying, "This technique shows us ________ about the characters." You need to say what the techniques show about Discovery. Even, say, when you are discussing the discoveries of Felik, you need to abstract them beyond the characters. The readers don't care about the characters, they care about Discovery in their own lives; how do the techniques speak to this? So, while we have effective analysis, we need stronger conceptual links.
Paragraph #2Again, nice conceptual start and good link to Shakespeare's text. Similar comments to above; be sure every quote/technique is linked to the aspect of Discovery you are talking about. Analysis here is better; more techniques, excellent work there. Be sure every paragraph is properly concluded!
Paragraph #3Dependent on resolution errors, I think there is a really long sentence in the middle of this paragraph to break up. Just that out of the way. Moving on; another good paragraph with solid techniques! Again though, lots of discussion about what we learn about characters. Remember, make it abstract,
what does audience learn about Discovery in general? I think this is a really cool essay Beth, especially for timed conditions, really really impressive. With only one day to go I want to give you two pieces of feedback to really focus on to improve:
1. Ensure that you answer the question. The demands of the question (concerning potential answers and such) were not adequately addressed in your response. That puts limitations on how well you can do, so make sure you really explicitly answer the question. Better overkill than under-kill! 
2. Ensure you Conclude your Essay. This ensures that everything is wrapped up nicely; even just a handful of sentences is enough and it will massively improve your mark to add it!
Best of luck for Paper 1, and I really hope this helps! 