HSC Stuff > HSC Modern History
Source Analysis Tips and Tricks to get a Band 6
sudodds:
--- Quote from: Emerald99 on September 30, 2016, 11:45:08 pm ---Thank you suddods and birdwing!(that felt really weird to type:P) I really appreciate the help:)
--- End quote ---
No worries! Always happy to help a fellow comrade ;) (you probably don't even do Russia as your national study but either ways thats what all modern students are called in my brain hahaha)
Emerald99:
Hahaactually our national study is Russia, our personality is Trotsky, and for english we did 1984 so I pre much had a russian overload this year
Goodluck in the HSC comrade, all the best :D
sudodds:
--- Quote from: Emerald99 on October 01, 2016, 08:23:19 pm ---Hahaactually our national study is Russia, our personality is Trotsky, and for english we did 1984 so I pre much had a russian overload this year
Goodluck in the HSC comrade, all the best :D
--- End quote ---
OMG! finally found someone who understands haha. Same here. Russia national study, Trotsky personality, Cold War conflict study, and then Hegelian-Maoist dialectics for history extension. Good luck also, particularly for the source section :) Just remember Usefulness = perspective + reliability and you should be sweet xx
Emerald99:
hahaha well almost understands, my last module is conflict in Europe. Yeah I'll definitely remember, thank you!
pughg16:
Sudodds, your breaking down of reliability is awesome...into factual and as evidence.
I'm thinking that an exxample of how to distinguish would be with propaganda, if the question was about "how propaganda was used..." I could say that the contents of the propaganda would be unreliable as a source of informantion, however as a source of evidence as to how propaganda was used, it is highly reliable...
That is just made up, so would sound clearly when talking about a particular source, but is that what you are meaning by breaking it down into two types of reliability?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version