Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 07:37:54 pm

Author Topic: Vector Resolutes  (Read 2165 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

shortgame11

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Respect: 0
Vector Resolutes
« on: July 26, 2016, 09:03:23 pm »
0
Would it be correct to think of these things (vector resolutes) as breaking a vector into its x and y components but x is just a different point of reference or in a different spot aka another vector. and is scaler resolutes vs Vector resolute just the same thing but one is a scaler answer (length?)... The Jacaranda textbook uses the most complex way of describing things

Syndicate

  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 797
  • Hard work beats Talent
  • Respect: +139
Re: Vector Resolutes
« Reply #1 on: July 26, 2016, 09:10:30 pm »
+2
Would it be correct to think of these things (vector resolutes) as breaking a vector into its x and y components but x is just a different point of reference or in a different spot aka another vector. and is scaler resolutes vs Vector resolute just the same thing but one is a scaler answer (length?)... The Jacaranda textbook uses the most complex way of describing things
Yes you are correct. The vector resolute of a Vector A in the direction of Vector B, basically represents vector A on vector B. The scalar resolute is infact the magnitude of the vector resolute (so there isn't much difference).



Vector a1 represents the vector resolute of vector a in the direction of vector b.

« Last Edit: July 26, 2016, 09:12:49 pm by Syndicate »
2017: Chemistry | Physics | English | Specialist Mathematics | Mathematics Methods
2018-2020 : Bachelor of Biomedicine at University of Melbourne

Physics Guide 2017

shortgame11

  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • Respect: 0
Re: Vector Resolutes
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2016, 09:20:46 pm »
0
Thank-you Kind sir  ;D