Hi there!
I would love some advice on essay structures which I've been considering in preparation for trials - I usually do integrated essays and have been a bit flustered trying to work out how to compare my 5 texts in an essay - My prescribed texts are Coleridge poems and Frankenstein, and my RTs are William Turner's painting Fishermen at Sea and Lord Byron's Childe Harold's Pilgrimage.
I don't like fully memorising essays, but I intend to have an organised structure planned something like this;
Thesis: (roughly) Romanticism and ways of interpreting man's relationship with nature --> ways of thinking about the individual's role in society.
Main idea one: The Sublime (ideas about nature's dominance over man)
Arguments
1.
- Coleridge poems (1+2)
- Turner painting
2.
- Frankenstein
- Byron poem
Main idea 2: Pantheistic philosophy (individual's spiritual + imaginative experiences in nature --> isolation, religious ideas, rejection of industrialisation etc)
3. individual's spiritual + imaginative experiences in nature (isolation + religious ideas)
- Coleridge poems
- Turner painting briefly
(Is it necessary to mention the text again?) 4. rejection of industrialisation + science
- Frankenstein
- Byron poem
I'm concerned that this thesis idea is too specific to prepare for all kinds of question - do you think I could mould this kind of essay to any part of the syllabus? I am attempting to build an unique standpoint, grounded in context, since a lot of teachers stress this for extension. I really want a set structure at least because integrating all this is confusing and I don't want to get muddled in exam conditions.
Obviously with Frankenstein there is more scope for ideas about the human condition, how do I think I could adjust this into a similar essay structure? Ie. could this fit into a rejection of science and in turn relate to Romantic attitudes towards nature?
Also in terms of word count - If I keep my creative short enough to finish in 40-50 mins do you think 1500 words is a reasonable goal for the essay? (I usually do about 1200 in 45 mins)
Is it necessary that I swap the related texts in the last two to be more comparative? (ie. Coleridge + Byron, Frankenstein + painting) I however don't have a strong analysis for this.
One more thing - how many critical references did you integrate in exam conditions? And is it ever appropriate to put one in the introduction? E.g if you are talking about Pantheism and want to substantiate context.
Sorry for all my rambling - I overthink a lot!!
Thank you so much
