Okay so in terms of knowing the study desing and the content im 100%, i can go as for to say as i can probably rewrite my book and it would be pretty accurate. So in terms of ammunition im loaded, i also have a deep underatanding of the topics which helps for mcqs. However regardless of my ammuniation whats the point if u cant shoot it. I dont know how to properly answer questions (short answers) in a coeherent, accurate and complete way. Ive heard the whole look at comand words and stuff. But does any one have a good tip in recgonising what the examniee wants by looking at the question and evaluating the marks. I did find trends like whenever a question asks to explain with an example two things, and that question is worth 4 marks ik one mark is for the example and the other is for the explanation, however what gets me is the questions where i have answered them and i dont know where the marks are gonna be allocated. Please help ik many students are struggling with this and especially since vcaa is making psychology more sciency and less like a health or humanities subject, good luck everyone