For question 10, it was asking what the requirement was for them to “receive the minimum wage”, not the minimum wage or above. So wouldn’t that be referring to people receiving exactly the minimum wage and not above? So for that reason I put covered by industrial awards, what do you guys think?
Atm I think I’m looking at about 18 for multi if that one is wrong, short answers are looking good, I know that all my content was right for the essay but I’m really not sure about how my structure was. For question 25 i did intro (put the trends and everything into there so I didn’t do another para), then did monetary, fiscal and microeconomic policy. For each policy I did a bit of the theory, then talked about how declining activity (gfc/Chinas shrinking commodities demand/improving IC due to lower exchange rate and TOT) impacted on each policy. Not sure if I was allowed to because it was an analyse question, but I talked about the ineffective macroeconomic policy mix because monetary policy has been said to be less effective in expansionary form and therefore needs to be supported by expansionary fiscal policy but due to political constraints it’s been a mildly contractionary stance. I’m not sure
Then I did 27, talked about similar experiences of globalisation, such as increased trade, increased borrowing of funds/investment, lower protection due to joining WTO, emergence of business cycles/financial contagion, dependence on commodity exports due to global specialisation and smaller export base and micro reform to deal with structural changes(these were my body paragraphs). My case study was Brazil so talked about different approches to sustainability based on Kunetz curve, and differences in growth due to differences in financial infrastructure/different approaches to growth.
Does this sound ok? I wasn’t really sure about structure really, none of the questions were typical economics questions where you could use a generic scaffold, which is probably what they trying to avoid. Thanks for doing the answers!!!