Hi Vox Nihili,
I noticed on your signature that you are doing MD and I had a few questions regarding entry and the GAMSAT. With your experience when did you begin studying for the GAMSAT? Is it a good idea to begin during first year? Would you say that the GAMSAT is doable as long as you study hard or do you think you need some sort of natural ability to do well in the GAMSAT? I'm in the position right now where I don't know if I should do Arts/Law at Monash or Science at Melbourne but with the goal of becoming a doctor or dentist in the end. I have a guarantee for a spot in the full fee MD because I got an atar of 99+ but it's very expensive and I don't want to rely on it unless I really have to. The best outcome would be doing well in GAMSAT and securing a CSP but I'm honestly not sure if this would be possible for me. I didn't do VCE Chemistry or Physics so am I disadvantaged? Sorry for the long message, I hope you don't mind me asking!
The GAMSAT is a little odd. There's a lot of disagreement around what works and how to study for it etc. To my knowledge, there hasn't really been much research in this space to clarify what techniques help with GAMSAT (although there has been for demographics and, unfortunately, for UMAT). In the case of UMAT they showed that receiving tutoring is only really useful for section III; not entirely clear how that would play out in GAMSAT because it's an entirely different test.
I can only really talk from personal experience, which you shouldn't take as gospel. Personally, I didn't study at all for the GAMSAT. I gave it two cracks. The first time I got 66 and the second time I got 80. The difference between the two probably comes down to a number of factors:
-another year of Biomedicine was helpful for science
-I started reading a lot more during second year (not for GAMSAT, just for enjoyment—I think this likely improved section I and II)
-the experience of having done it before
-I was less invested in the test itself
-luck
The last is probably the most important factor here, to be honest. You should expect a little bit of natural variation in how you perform on a test. It would be quite a bad test if it were to the tune of 14 points, so the other factors matter too.
To answer your question about study vs natural ability; I think that you definitely need the latter. It is certainly the case though that people study to the test and end up producing a good result, so the former is also entirely valid. The GAMSAT is though; however, it is not impossible to do well. Coming in with a little bit of confidence to give it a crack would go a long way for you I think