revision..dnt understand quote

[VCE22]

im tring to have have two perspectives are different in their attitude to the use of violence during the revolution. and least have have 4 piecs of supportive evidence for each historian's perspective. and have a link between the evidence and the historians perspective. example culd be a historian draw this conculsion frm the information used>?


"For schama the French revolution was a bloody interlude and as with furet he feels that the revolution lost its way with the terror"


" The french revolutionaries were an assortment of unexceptional circumstances who when things fell apart responded to an overwhelming need to make sense of things according to new principles"

[Zoe]

I'm not exactly sure what you're are trying to say. But if your looking for historians attitude to violence in the revolution, definatly use Schamas "violence was the motor for the revolution" or "violence became the energy of the revolution"
You could use examples of how the sans-culottes used violence to achieve what they wanted at various stages of the revolution in conjunction with this?