Hey guys!!
So, our proposal is due pretty soon- as in NEXT WEEK- (i know its fairly late compared to other schools...) and i was wondering whether i could get some confirmation on some aspects.
My topic area is: the documentation of history explored through the lens of the Manhattan Project.
My question is:
"The historian without his facts is rootless and futile, the facts without their historian are dead and meaningless."
Assess this statement through the lens of the Manhattan Project.
BUT now i am thinking that I shouldnt state my case study in the question... so am wondering if this will work better:
"The historian without his facts is rootless and futile, the facts without their historian are dead and meaningless."
Assess the accuracy of this statement in regards to the documentation of modern history.
Would something like that be better?? And then i can just refer to the methods, processes, aims, etc. of historians on the Manhattan Project throughout, as well as the value of sources in aiding modern historians???
Now for an outline of the essay... i am really not sure how to structure it!! Any ideas would be greatly appreciated...
Should i do something like:
Intro
Value of Facts for modern historians
Importance of historians in documentation
Changing approaches, nature of evidence, etc.
Conclusion
and then just add Manhattan Project historians as a case study throughout??? sorry i have no idea...if this is completely the wrong idea please tell me

Also- am i on the right track in regards to this? and does anyone have any inquiry questions i could use that relate to my topic area?
Thanks so much for any quick replies- they will be appreciated very, very much!!! i am currently a bit stressed!!

Cheers,
Never.Give.Up
