Hello,
Given a scenario whereby a firm has used an incorrect depreciation method to depreciate one of their assets (e.g. they used Straight-line method of depreciation to depreciate a vehicle), can they change to an alternative method (from straight-line to Reducing Balance) during that assets useful life?
Here is how I would tackle a question relating to this, but I am unsure if it is correct.
A business shouldn't change depreciation methods because it undermines the demands of comparability, since the amount of depreciation that would be recorded in the different periods would be derived from different calculations - with straight-line using the historical cost of the asset while the reducing balance method uses the Carrying Value.
This inconsistency in the calculation of the depreciation expense between periods means that management cannot make effective comparisons between the profit reported at the end of each period, which can adversely affect the quality of their decision making, further breaching the demands of relevance.
However, provided that an incorrect method has been chosen initially, the business can switch the depreciation method so that a more accurate profit figure can be reported, and thus more informed decisions can be made by management - which upholds relevance.
thanks