Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 03:06:29 pm

Author Topic: Trig/complex question  (Read 708 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Trig/complex question
« on: November 01, 2009, 05:41:01 pm »
0


1st or 2nd quadrant for A

Show that

So I went about this by trying to find

But I get as my final answer instead of . I can't pinpoint what I've done

EDIT: I can also do this question by solving for x as a quadratic, but I would still like someone to explain why the first method isn't working
« Last Edit: November 01, 2009, 05:44:23 pm by NE2000 »
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

kurrymuncher

  • Guest
Re: Trig/complex question
« Reply #1 on: November 01, 2009, 05:44:23 pm »
0
no, you're over complicating it.

sub x in as cisA. the reciprocal of cisA is just cis(-A), which is cosA -isinA

therefore

it is cosA + isin A +cosA - isinA= 2cosA

is that what you were after?

NE2000

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1221
  • living an alternate reality
  • Respect: +4
Re: Trig/complex question
« Reply #2 on: November 01, 2009, 05:46:50 pm »
0
I think the question wants you to prove x=cis(A) given the information in the first line above.

But still your method works :) I'm still hoping to find why my method above didn't work...
2009: English, Specialist Math, Mathematical Methods, Chemistry, Physics

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: Trig/complex question
« Reply #3 on: November 01, 2009, 09:54:31 pm »
0
I think kurrymuncher's method really shows that x=cis(A) is a solution, but doesn't show that it is neccesarily the solution, e.g: x^2=4, well by plugging in x=2 you get a correct statement but that doesn't mean that x=2 was neccesary, since x=-2 was possible.

And NE2000. Think about this: , if you make the substitution you get:  which has the exact same structure as the first equation!, only different notation. This means that if x solves this equation then so does 1/x. However maybe one solution may be ruled out by using the info that it's 1st or second quadrant, cbf thinking any further :(

Just fill me in on the details of your solution, because i don't really know what you did, the statement you have provided is correct, (because first of second quadrant).
« Last Edit: November 01, 2009, 10:01:52 pm by kamil9876 »
Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

humph

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1437
  • Respect: +16
Re: Trig/complex question
« Reply #4 on: November 02, 2009, 01:08:52 am »
0
Just let , substitute it in, and equate real and imaginary parts.
VCE 2006
PhB (Hons) (Sc), ANU, 2007-2010
MPhil, ANU, 2011-2012
PhD, Princeton, 2012-2017
Research Associate, University College London, 2017-2020
Assistant Professor, University of Virginia, 2020-

Feel free to ask me about (advanced) mathematics.