sac scores and study score relationships

[dempy12]

I was just wondering if i was getting high 80's all year in sacs and a few 90's what kind of study score would i be looking at if i continue along these lines

[Hooligan]

I'd say 35+

[BiG DaN]

I was just wondering if i was getting high 80's all year in sacs and a few 90's what kind of study score would i be looking at if i continue along these lines

depends on how u do on exams/how hard ur schools sacs are
i averaged 87% last year and got study score of 44

[GerrySly]

i averaged 87% last year and got study score of 44

My friend dropped 3 marks for the year and then screwed up the first exam and got the same study score haha

[Gloamglozer]

Well last year, in order to get an A+, you needed:

Exam 1: 36+ out of 40
Exam 2: 49+ out of 60.

In 2007, it was also:

Exam 1: 36+/40

to get an A+.  But exam 2 looked a a little bit more accessible with:

Exam 2: 51.5+/60

So as you can see, it is pretty competitive to get a 40+ in Further and even more so if you want a 45+.

Sources:
2008 Graded Distribtions:
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/statistics/2008/statssect3.html#H3N10145
2007 Graded Distributions:
http://www.vcaa.vic.edu.au/vce/statistics/2007/statssect3.html#H3N10139

[VxBlitzxN]

strong linear correlation =.=

[lachymm]

Haha

[QuantumJG]

I was just wondering if i was getting high 80's all year in sacs and a few 90's what kind of study score would i be looking at if i continue along these lines

SAC's really don't contribute much at all, they do have some form of prediction of what you could get in the exam. In methods I averaged 79% and this went up to A+ because of my exams.