VCE Stuff > VCE Computing: Software Development

How did y'all find the exam?

<< < (2/3) > >>

Arthurmorgan:

--- Quote from: yourfriendlyneighbourhoodghost on November 15, 2019, 12:55:39 pm ---Hey (:

Yeah I actually took too much time trying to find the new tasks 😂, but then I found out that all you had to do was colour in the blank boxes next to the tasks already listed, well that's what I hope is right, with VCAA you never know 😂

--- End quote ---

Pretty late response, but I also found that kind of strange that they would just make it a fill in the blanks.

yourfriendlyneighbourhoodghost:

--- Quote from: Arthurmorgan on December 10, 2019, 10:05:01 am ---Pretty late response, but I also found that kind of strange that they would just make it a fill in the blanks.

--- End quote ---
Yeah, and it is so simple so you second guess yourself and waste even more time 😂 How did you find the exam as a whole?

Arthurmorgan:

--- Quote from: yourfriendlyneighbourhoodghost on December 10, 2019, 10:49:39 am ---Yeah, and it is so simple so you second guess yourself and waste even more time 😂 How did you find the exam as a whole?

--- End quote ---

To be honest, it was probably one of the easiest Computing exams from the past years imo. During the practices there would always be one question where I just made up random stuff and hoped for the best but I didn't find that on this exam. The question on interpreting the stats was something I never really saw before on a practice exam but still nothing difficult as the trend was fairly obvious. The question on which design is more secure had me panicking for a bit until I saw one of the designs had a sign in button. One of the first couple questions on the types of checks I also felt was a bit to simple and would've been better suited for the multiple choice. The question on the variable for finance was also interesting since I don't think the assessors really considered how rounding regarding finance works however I felt as if they were fishing for floating point as the answer (but still a really poor question).

So yeah, felt pretty good after it. Hopefully we can achieve that over 40  ;D



yourfriendlyneighbourhoodghost:

--- Quote from: Arthurmorgan on December 10, 2019, 10:30:54 pm ---To be honest, it was probably one of the easiest Computing exams from the past years imo. During the practices there would always be one question where I just made up random stuff and hoped for the best but I didn't find that on this exam. The question on interpreting the stats was something I never really saw before on a practice exam but still nothing difficult as the trend was fairly obvious. The question on which design is more secure had me panicking for a bit until I saw one of the designs had a sign in button. One of the first couple questions on the types of checks I also felt was a bit to simple and would've been better suited for the multiple choice. The question on the variable for finance was also interesting since I don't think the assessors really considered how rounding regarding finance works however I felt as if they were fishing for floating point as the answer (but still a really poor question).

So yeah, felt pretty good after it. Hopefully we can achieve that over 40  ;D

--- End quote ---

That's really good! All my friends felt the same way. I just finished on time which was good.

Yes, I hope we will get over 40 too😊👍

Btw, what did you do for the SAT? What app did you create?

Arthurmorgan:

--- Quote from: yourfriendlyneighbourhoodghost on December 11, 2019, 09:12:54 am ---That's really good! All my friends felt the same way. I just finished on time which was good.

Yes, I hope we will get over 40 too😊👍

Btw, what did you do for the SAT? What app did you create?

--- End quote ---

An application that creates tax invoices based on user selection and has unique templates based on the user who is signed in; also featured GST related features. Nothing to complicated but I felt like it fit the requirements well. What about you?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version