Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 08, 2025, 05:15:45 am

Author Topic: Help  (Read 725 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

dejan91

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 824
  • Without risk, there is no adventure.
  • Respect: +7
Help
« on: November 07, 2009, 03:54:06 pm »
0
Let the function have a rule , where . Let be another continuous function with domain . For all real values of , what will the derivatives of be equal to?

The answer is  .

 I don't get the worked solutions when it says: let . Why suddenly introduce log?

« Last Edit: November 07, 2009, 04:16:26 pm by dejan91 »
When I get sad, I stop being sad, and be AWESOME instead. True story.

tl

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 72
  • Respect: 0
Re: Help
« Reply #1 on: November 07, 2009, 04:05:51 pm »
0
Umm... is that the entire question?
[2009] Raw: Chinese SL (35) FurDA MAT (48) Methods (39)
[2010] Aspirations: EnGLISH (40), Chem (45), Physics (40), Methods CAS (again yo) (50 c'mon LOL)

dejan91

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 824
  • Without risk, there is no adventure.
  • Respect: +7
Re: Help
« Reply #2 on: November 07, 2009, 04:16:06 pm »
0
It was multi-choice:

A

B

C

D

E
When I get sad, I stop being sad, and be AWESOME instead. True story.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Help
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2009, 04:23:54 pm »
0
one function is the other function is

We require

Thus let and



1.

Thus

2.

Thus overall


This question is way beyond Methods, in Methods you don't need to derive exponentials except for e.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

kamil9876

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1943
  • Respect: +109
Re: Help
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2009, 04:26:04 pm »
0

Quote
I don't get the worked solutions when it says: let a^{x} = e^{kx} : log_{e}(a^{x}) = kx . Why suddenly introduce log?


this is the definition of logarithm, inverse function of exponential.

Personally I would just make the subsitution:

let so that I can differentiate. They probably tried to do the same thing.

Voltaire: "There is an astonishing imagination even in the science of mathematics ... We repeat, there is far more imagination in the head of Archimedes than in that of Homer."

dejan91

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 824
  • Without risk, there is no adventure.
  • Respect: +7
Re: Help
« Reply #5 on: November 07, 2009, 04:46:16 pm »
0
This question is way beyond Methods, in Methods you don't need to derive exponentials except for e.

I wasn't expecting that from Neap! :O

kamil9876, I think they tried the first way you mentioned, beacause another part of the solution was exactly what you had there with the kx.
When I get sad, I stop being sad, and be AWESOME instead. True story.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Help
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2009, 04:51:18 pm »
0
Yeah kamil's way is pretty good, but for Methods sake, if you see questions where the base is not e and you want to derive it, just make it to the base e by some manipulation.
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.