Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 12:22:55 pm

Author Topic: water and solids in the constant  (Read 1755 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mano91

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 175
  • Respect: +3
  • School: Caroline Chisholm Catholic College
  • School Grad Year: 2009
water and solids in the constant
« on: November 11, 2009, 06:56:14 pm »
0
we dont include these do we?
is there any limitations to this wen working out the equilibrium constant?
2008: Mathematical Methods (CAS) [36]
2009: English [34] Chemistry [37] Physics [34] Specialist Mathematics [39] Physical Education [24]
ENTER: 94.50
2010-2013: Bachelor of Engineering (Civil & Infrastructure)

TheJosh

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 134
  • Respect: +6
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2009, 07:06:17 pm »
0
I know that when looking at a weak acid ionisation reaction eg.   HA   +   H2O   <--> H3O+   +   A-

In the constant you dont include the water as its concentration is virtually constant in weak ionisations
« Last Edit: November 11, 2009, 07:13:27 pm by TheJosh »

linny

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
  • Respect: +1
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2009, 07:10:01 pm »
0
you include it when water is in gaseous state apparently
but when water is in liquid form you dont include it

StringFever

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 291
  • Facebook-free since September
  • Respect: +1
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2009, 07:14:52 pm »
0
Oh, I thought we were to include them in the constant expression, but NOT in the calculations of the value?
2008: Biology
2009: English Literature, Chemistry, Mathematical Methods, Indonesian SL, Theatre Studies

linny

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
  • Respect: +1
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2009, 07:18:09 pm »
0
tsfx says that to put it in the expression

i dont know. personally i'd leave it out; thats the way ive been taught.....

StringFever

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 291
  • Facebook-free since September
  • Respect: +1
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2009, 07:20:18 pm »
0
tsfx says that to put it in the expression

i dont know. personally i'd leave it out; thats the way ive been taught.....

Hmm...that makes me more iffy about it. While they're geniuses no doubt, some of their things don't quite gel with VCELand Chemistry :S
2008: Biology
2009: English Literature, Chemistry, Mathematical Methods, Indonesian SL, Theatre Studies

linny

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
  • Respect: +1
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2009, 07:22:23 pm »
0
im pretty sure you leave it out though ..

look through your past papers solutions.

arthurk

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 405
  • Respect: +3
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2009, 07:40:03 pm »
0
tsfx is bs anyway

TheJosh

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 134
  • Respect: +6
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2009, 07:45:20 pm »
0

rajah21

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 69
  • Respect: +16
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2009, 09:43:49 pm »
0
I heard that, because solids are assumed to have a value of 1, you should leave them out in order to indicate that you realise that solids don't alter the K value?

Although, don't quote me on this as I may be wrong - I'm not sure how credible my source is.  ???
2008: Biology 44
2009: Religion and Society 38 || English 44 || Mathematical Methods 44 || Chemistry 46 || Indonesian SL 48
ENTER: 98.85

arthurk

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 405
  • Respect: +3
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2009, 09:57:26 pm »
0
I heard that, because solids are assumed to have a value of 1, you should leave them out in order to indicate that you realise that solids don't alter the K value?

Although, don't quote me on this as I may be wrong - I'm not sure how credible my source is.  ???
i heard this too from my tutor so it should be right

TheJosh

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 134
  • Respect: +6
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #11 on: November 11, 2009, 10:07:19 pm »
0
can you give example of solid in a equilibrium equation? and where you would omit it

Potter

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 148
  • Respect: +1
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2009, 09:55:02 pm »
0
can you give example of solid in a equilibrium equation? and where you would omit it

Decomposition of Calcium carboonate
CaCO3(s) <--> CaO(s) + CO2(g)

K = [CO2](all solids have a value of 1). If it's the reverse reaction it's K = 1/[CO2]

I don't think the vce course goes into heterogeneous equilibria(different states)

Thinking about it now... this post is pretty useless since exams are over xD
2009-  IT: Applications [40]

2010- English | Specialist | Methods | Chem | MUEP Chem |

2011- ...Lets see where this road will take me.

linny

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 163
  • Respect: +1
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #13 on: November 13, 2009, 09:43:37 am »
0
lol im sure it'll come in handy in ............uni........

biggzee

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 5
  • Respect: 0
Re: water and solids in the constant
« Reply #14 on: November 14, 2009, 09:13:56 am »
0
you cant change the concentration of a solid or liquid, only gaseous and aqueous species have changable concentrations, and hence are the only ones that will have any effect on K.

while we assume that the concentration of a solid or liquid is 1, it is likely not, as it all depends on the structure,but it doesnt matter for the purposes of any calculations anyway. water for example has a concentraion of 55.6M at 4C (1 litre -> 1000g -> 55.6mol)
2008: Methods [49], Further [50]
2009: Physics [48], Chemistry [50], English [44], Specialist [47]
ENTER: 99.85
2010: Bachelor of Science (Science Scholars Program), Monash