Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 08, 2025, 05:16:58 am

Author Topic: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread  (Read 2282 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

samuch

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
  • Respect: +6
Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« on: December 28, 2009, 09:08:39 pm »
0
i guess its because im in holiday mode (i really hope thats the reason  :buck2:) but i dont get how to make x the subject of this:



i end up with t/q which is really wrong...

also

Three points have coordinates A(1,7), B(7,5) and C(0,-2). Find:

a) the equation of the perpendicular bisector of AB
b) the point of intersection of this perpendicular bisector and BC

iv done some of part a... iv gotten 3 as the gradient of the perpendicular line but cant get the y-int, forgotten how to :P
2008: KLD young scholar
VCE 2009: Psychology
VCE 2010: Methods (CAS), Specialist Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Literature

2011: Bachelor of commerce/science at monash

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #1 on: December 28, 2009, 09:21:48 pm »
0














Quote
Three points have coordinates A(1,7), B(7,5) and C(0,-2). Find:

a) the equation of the perpendicular bisector of AB
b) the point of intersection of this perpendicular bisector and BC

a) First find the equation of the line AB.

Then you need to find the midpoint of AB. (That is what "bisector" means)

Then you need to find the equation of the line that passes through this midpoint also this line must be perpendicular to the line AB, ie

b) First you need to find the equation of the line BC and then you need to set up a simultaneous equation to solve for the intersection point.
« Last Edit: December 28, 2009, 09:27:49 pm by TrueTears »
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

zzdfa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 328
  • Respect: +4
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #2 on: December 28, 2009, 09:22:40 pm »
0
       multiply both sides by pt

       rearrange

      factorize
« Last Edit: December 28, 2009, 09:52:22 pm by zzdfa »

samuch

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
  • Respect: +6
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #3 on: December 28, 2009, 09:25:20 pm »
0
oh :) thanks both of you
hmm TT i sent you a PM earlier today, not sure if you checked
2008: KLD young scholar
VCE 2009: Psychology
VCE 2010: Methods (CAS), Specialist Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Literature

2011: Bachelor of commerce/science at monash

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #4 on: December 28, 2009, 09:26:43 pm »
0
oh :) thanks both of you
hmm TT i sent you a PM earlier today, not sure if you checked
Lol sorry, someone else just sent me a pm and it went to the next page of pm's, so didn't see yours which was on the other page, sorry!
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Lighties

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 90
  • Respect: +1
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2009, 09:27:42 pm »
0
Just wondering, how do you do the spiffy thing where you set out the equations neatly (the format)?
2010.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2009, 09:28:27 pm »
0
Just wondering, how do you do the spiffy thing where you set out the equations neatly (the format)?
Do you mean ?

Have a look here http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,10280.0.html
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

Lighties

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 90
  • Respect: +1
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #7 on: December 28, 2009, 09:31:37 pm »
0
Yeah, I did. Thank you! (:

It looks more complicated than I thought.
2010.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #8 on: December 28, 2009, 09:32:49 pm »
0
Yeah, I did. Thank you! (:

It looks more complicated than I thought.
It just takes some time to learn the code etc, you will get used to it soon if you practise :P
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

TrueTears

  • TT
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 16363
  • Respect: +667
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #9 on: December 28, 2009, 09:37:10 pm »
0
iv done some of part a... iv gotten 3 as the gradient of the perpendicular line but cant get the y-int, forgotten how to :P
Yeah that's to find the value of in

But... comes to rescue! ( is the point where the line passes through, so just sub it in :P)
PhD @ MIT (Economics).

Interested in asset pricing, econometrics, and social choice theory.

samuch

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
  • Respect: +6
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #10 on: December 28, 2009, 09:40:20 pm »
0
iv done some of part a... iv gotten 3 as the gradient of the perpendicular line but cant get the y-int, forgotten how to :P
Yeah that's to find the value of in

But... comes to rescue! ( is the point where the line passes through, so just sub it in :P)
okok so maybe that equation is better :P
2008: KLD young scholar
VCE 2009: Psychology
VCE 2010: Methods (CAS), Specialist Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Literature

2011: Bachelor of commerce/science at monash

samuch

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
  • Respect: +6
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #11 on: December 30, 2009, 03:19:48 pm »
0
another one :(

simultaneous equations, solve for x and y:



2008: KLD young scholar
VCE 2009: Psychology
VCE 2010: Methods (CAS), Specialist Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Literature

2011: Bachelor of commerce/science at monash

Stroodle

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 855
  • Respect: +4
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #12 on: December 30, 2009, 04:52:03 pm »
0
another one :(

simultaneous equations, solve for x and y:





From the first equation you can see that

Plugging this value of into the second equation yields:



Then after making the common denominator and expanding you get:







You can now plug this value of into either of the first two equations to solve for


Edit* Another way that may be easier would be to multiply the first equation by and the second by , then subtract the second equation from the first etc..
« Last Edit: December 30, 2009, 04:57:00 pm by Stroodle »

samuch

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
  • Respect: +6
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #13 on: December 30, 2009, 04:55:56 pm »
0
^ ah i get it :) thank you!
looked harder than it was :P
« Last Edit: December 30, 2009, 05:07:47 pm by samuch »
2008: KLD young scholar
VCE 2009: Psychology
VCE 2010: Methods (CAS), Specialist Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Literature

2011: Bachelor of commerce/science at monash

samuch

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1020
  • Respect: +6
Re: Samuch's *facepalm* question thread
« Reply #14 on: January 15, 2010, 01:39:45 pm »
0
another noob question:

find the coordinates of the points of intersection

x^2 + y^2 = 178
x + y = 13


and


x + y = 28
xy = 187
2008: KLD young scholar
VCE 2009: Psychology
VCE 2010: Methods (CAS), Specialist Maths, Chemistry, Physics and Literature

2011: Bachelor of commerce/science at monash