Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 12:31:27 pm

Author Topic: Redox reactions - identifying conjugates (easy)  (Read 5784 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Nomvalt

  • Guest
Redox reactions - identifying conjugates (easy)
« on: March 21, 2010, 12:13:55 pm »
0
Is the following a redox reaction? If it is a redox reaction, identify the oxidant, the reductant and their conjugates by annotating the equation.

Fe(s) + CuSO4(aq) ---> FeSO4(aq) + Cu(s)

I get confused with questions that ask for the conjugate oxidant of a reductant (or conjugate reductant of an oxidant). :(

Edmund

  • Dr. Ruler Snapper
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1849
  • Respect: +95
Re: Redox reactions - identifying conjugates (easy)
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2010, 12:35:08 pm »
0
Cu2+ gets reduced and is therefore an oxidant. Cu is the conjugate reductant.

Fe gets oxidised and is therefore a reductant. FeSO4 is the conjugate oxidant.
2007-2008 VCE ATAR 90.15
2009-2011 BSc (Unimelb)
2012-2015 DDS (Unimelb)

Booksale: Drugs That Shape Society, Forests in a Global Context

coletrain

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 228
  • Respect: +1
Re: Redox reactions - identifying conjugates (easy)
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2010, 12:39:05 pm »
0
i find writing the ionic equation help to identify either oxidant and or reductant
2010- English, Chemistry, Physics, Methods CAS & Further Maths

Nomvalt

  • Guest
Re: Redox reactions - identifying conjugates (easy)
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2010, 12:40:47 pm »
0
Cu2+ gets reduced and is therefore an oxidant. Cu is the conjugate reductant.

Fe gets oxidised and is therefore a reductant. FeSO4 is the conjugate oxidant.

Would it still be correct if you had said that the oxidant was Cu2+ in CuSO4 or CuSO4?

And what about if you had said that the conjugate oxidant was Fe2+ in FeSO4? Or does it not really matter?

Edmund

  • Dr. Ruler Snapper
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1849
  • Respect: +95
Re: Redox reactions - identifying conjugates (easy)
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2010, 12:44:53 pm »
0
Cu2+ gets reduced and is therefore an oxidant. Cu is the conjugate reductant.

Fe gets oxidised and is therefore a reductant. FeSO4 is the conjugate oxidant.

Would it still be correct if you had said that the oxidant was Cu2+ in CuSO4 or CuSO4?

And what about if you had said that the conjugate oxidant was Fe2+ in FeSO4? Or does it not really matter?
I think it would be correct and wouldn't matter

Not sure about this though
2007-2008 VCE ATAR 90.15
2009-2011 BSc (Unimelb)
2012-2015 DDS (Unimelb)

Booksale: Drugs That Shape Society, Forests in a Global Context

Nomvalt

  • Guest
Re: Redox reactions - identifying conjugates (easy)
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2010, 12:55:13 pm »
0
2Na(s) + 2H2O(l) ---> 2NaOH(aq) + H2(g)

With the same question as above but using a different equation would:
oxidant = H in H2O
reductant = Na
Conjugate reductant of oxidant= H2
Conjugate oxidant of reductant: NaOH

?

Edmund

  • Dr. Ruler Snapper
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1849
  • Respect: +95
Re: Redox reactions - identifying conjugates (easy)
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2010, 02:07:15 pm »
0
2Na(s) + 2H2O(l) ---> 2NaOH(aq) + H2(g)

With the same question as above but using a different equation would:
oxidant = H in H2O
reductant = Na
Conjugate reductant of oxidant= H2
Conjugate oxidant of reductant: NaOH

?
Yes
2007-2008 VCE ATAR 90.15
2009-2011 BSc (Unimelb)
2012-2015 DDS (Unimelb)

Booksale: Drugs That Shape Society, Forests in a Global Context