Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 09:57:26 am

Author Topic: Core module sac help  (Read 1037 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

UncleXxx

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • Respect: +1
Core module sac help
« on: April 29, 2010, 05:43:11 pm »
0
The question i'm being asked is *which of the 3 equations of least square regression line best enables travel time to be predicted form distance travelled.*
The 3 regression lines i have are: [Public transport] y=2.41x-3.81 , r=0.66 and r^2=0.43
                                              [Private transport] y=.99x+5.94, r=0.866 and r^2=0.75
                                              [Both public and private] y=1.11x+11.11, r=0.59 and r^2=0.35
Besides talking about the r and r^2 value, where higher r=stronger relation, what else could i talk about to determine the better regression line?               Note: y=time taken and x=distance travelled
                                                                                                              THank you =]

akira88

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1030
  • Respect: +4
Re: Core module sac help
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2010, 06:15:45 pm »
0
Well the only thing that you can talk about are the r and r^2 values :)
EDIT: Unless you do a residual analysis and then you would have a little more to talk about! ::)
2009: Further Maths | Literature
2010: English | Biology | Chemistry | Methods | Psychology
94.50
2011: Pharmacy/Commerce Monash
2012: Second year yo!
Certificate III in Business
Certificate IV in Business Adminstration
Feel free to ask or message me for anything, I don't bite :]

UncleXxx

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • Respect: +1
Re: Core module sac help
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2010, 06:39:55 pm »
0
awesome =] thanks for the help.
so the y-intercept and gradient has no relevance in determining the better regression line?

crayolé

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 788
  • Respect: +3
Re: Core module sac help
« Reply #3 on: April 29, 2010, 06:47:03 pm »
0
awesome =] thanks for the help.
so the y-intercept and gradient has no relevance in determining the better regression line?
Nope ;]

UncleXxx

  • Victorian
  • Adventurer
  • *
  • Posts: 22
  • Respect: +1
Re: Core module sac help
« Reply #4 on: April 29, 2010, 06:55:03 pm »
0
Aweeessomme  :) thank you to both of you.

Visionz

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Respect: +1
Re: Core module sac help
« Reply #5 on: April 29, 2010, 07:23:59 pm »
0
Private transport. 75% of the time it is explained.. blah..

amirite?

crayolé

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 788
  • Respect: +3
Re: Core module sac help
« Reply #6 on: April 29, 2010, 10:16:49 pm »
0
Yeah, 75% of the variation in time taken(independent variable) can be explained by the variation in distance travelled(independent variable) the other 25% may be explained by other factors such as traffic conditions, weather etc.

The bolded bit may be completely left out but i like to include it just for the kicks or to show the teacher you've been studying ;P

Visionz

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Respect: +1
Re: Core module sac help
« Reply #7 on: April 29, 2010, 11:45:44 pm »
0
Yeah, 75% of the variation in time taken(independent variable) can be explained by the variation in distance travelled(independent variable) the other 25% may be explained by other factors such as traffic conditions, weather etc.

The bolded bit may be completely left out but i like to include it just for the kicks or to show the teacher you've been studying ;P

That doesnt really show that youve been studying. Its just shows youve got the capability to reason. One of the questions on my core SAC asked me to show this sort of reasoning.

crayolé

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 788
  • Respect: +3
Re: Core module sac help
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2010, 12:23:05 am »
0
Yeah, 75% of the variation in time taken(independent variable) can be explained by the variation in distance travelled(independent variable) the other 25% may be explained by other factors such as traffic conditions, weather etc.

The bolded bit may be completely left out but i like to include it just for the kicks or to show the teacher you've been studying ;P

That doesnt really show that youve been studying. Its just shows youve got the capability to reason. One of the questions on my core SAC asked me to show this sort of reasoning.
Oh really? Maybe its just cos my schools standards are extremely low then ;P