Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 08, 2025, 04:13:50 am

Author Topic: Implicit Differentiation & Related Rates  (Read 1444 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Gloamglozer

  • The Walking VTAC Guide
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4170
  • Here to listen and help
  • Respect: +324
Implicit Differentiation & Related Rates
« on: April 26, 2010, 07:43:50 pm »
0
1.  We have the equation .  Find the points on the curve which the tangent line is parallel to .

I've differentiated it and got:











If it is to be parallel to , then that means that .

So the next thing I should do would be:

  Right?

2.  Just to note, this is an assignment question.  Feel free to help me as much or as less as you wish. 

I think the main problem is identifying the rates.

A street light is mounted at the top of a 5.4 metre pole.  A man 1.8 m tall walks away from the light in a straight path at a speed of 1 m/s.  How fast is the top of the his shadow moving when he is 10 m from the pole?

I've drawn a picture:


From that, I've calculated the length of the shadow, which I can't find how it would relate to the question:

Let x be the length of the shadow.








I think what I need to do next is to get the m/s but I can't figure out what to do next with setting up the chain rule.

Bachelor of Science (Mathematics & Statistics) - Discrete Mathematics & Operations Research

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Implicit Differentiation & Related Rates
« Reply #1 on: April 26, 2010, 07:49:35 pm »
0
For the first question, I see no problems in what you have done.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Implicit Differentiation & Related Rates
« Reply #2 on: April 26, 2010, 07:49:55 pm »
0
For 1. yeah, let then and .

Sub that into the original relation, and solve.

2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Implicit Differentiation & Related Rates
« Reply #3 on: April 26, 2010, 08:41:28 pm »
0
2.

You want to find the rate of change of length of shadow with respect to time.

Let distance from man to pole = d. As he is walking at 1 m/s,  d=t, where t is time in seconds.

Let length of shadow = l.

So you want which by the chain rule is equivalent to .

You should be able to figure it out from there, keeping in mind your earlier workings...


I did the working then remembered it is an assignment, and you may not want me to do it for you... But it's here anyway, because I didn't want to waste typing it all out...

\frac{dd}{dt}=1 So \frac{dl}{dt}=\frac{dl}{dd}

From the similar triangles you set up \frac{1.8}{l}=\frac{5.4}{d+l}

1.8d+1.8l=5.4l

l=\frac{1.8}{3.6}d

\frac{dl}{dd}=\frac{1}{2}.

Therefore, from earlier working, \frac{dl}{dt}=\frac{1}{2} \cdot 1 ms^{-1}
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

Chavi

  • sober since 1992
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1413
  • "Death to the juice"
  • Respect: +5
Re: Implicit Differentiation & Related Rates
« Reply #4 on: April 26, 2010, 08:51:19 pm »
0
Question 2 involves a few steps:
a) let the distance between the dude and the pole = d (not 10, as this figure is subject to change)
b) express x in terms of d: (similar triangles) solving for x gives
c) find the speed at which the length of the shadow is increasing:



from before so

as

d) Express, in terms of x, the distance fo the end point, P, of the shadow



and thus the change in shadow size/movement with respect to time:



hope that helps
m@tty beat me to it :)
« Last Edit: April 26, 2010, 08:54:02 pm by Chavi »
2009: Math Methods CAS [48]
2010: English [47]|Specialist Maths[44]|Physics[42]|Hebrew[37]|Accounting[48]  atar: 99.80
My blog: http://diasporism.wordpress.com/

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Implicit Differentiation & Related Rates
« Reply #5 on: April 26, 2010, 08:56:05 pm »
0
Ah, yes. You have to add the speed of movement of the guy relative to the pole as well. So my final answer is not quite correct.
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
  • Respect: +7
Re: Implicit Differentiation & Related Rates
« Reply #6 on: April 27, 2010, 12:58:29 pm »
0
Yep I got x = 3/2^0.25 and y = -3/2^0.25

I also got x = -3/2^0.25 and y = 3/2^0.25

I got 3/2 m/sec for the second part.
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75

Gloamglozer

  • The Walking VTAC Guide
  • Honorary Moderator
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4170
  • Here to listen and help
  • Respect: +324
Re: Implicit Differentiation & Related Rates
« Reply #7 on: April 27, 2010, 01:43:36 pm »
0
Yep I got x = 3/2^0.25 and y = -3/2^0.25

I also got x = -3/2^0.25 and y = 3/2^0.25

I got 3/2 m/sec for the second part.

Awesomeness.  Good work ILLM.  H1 on the way for you.  :D

Bachelor of Science (Mathematics & Statistics) - Discrete Mathematics & Operations Research

Ilovemathsmeth

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1370
  • Respect: +7
Re: Implicit Differentiation & Related Rates
« Reply #8 on: April 30, 2010, 09:54:48 pm »
0
I really hope so because my other subjects are going downhill... :S Good luck to you too!
Raw Scores:
Psychology 50 | Mathematical Methods 49 | Further Mathematics 49 | Accounting 49 | Chemistry 44 | English 43
ATAR: 99.75