Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 11:02:19 am

Author Topic: .  (Read 3799 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: andrewloppol's chemistry question thread
« Reply #15 on: May 29, 2010, 12:30:53 pm »
0
For argument's sake, an element (sufficiently close to an oxidation number of 3 or 3.5) could have an oxidation number of it wouldn't matter because it doesn't mean anything.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

fady_22

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
  • Respect: +5
Re: andrewloppol's chemistry question thread
« Reply #16 on: May 29, 2010, 06:41:54 pm »
0
Quote
Maltose is a dissacharide like sucrose. Sucrose is shown in the data book. Counting the
hydroxyl groups gives 8 and there are 3 ether groups counting the two in the rings themselves.

I thought only one ether :S??
Maltose is a disaccharide with two glucose molecules.
Each glucose molecule contains one ether group in the ring itself, and the link between the two glucose molecules is also an ether. In total, 3 ether groups.
2009: Biology [46]
2010: Literature [44], Chemistry [50], Physics [46], Mathematical Methods CAS [46], Specialist Mathematics [42]

ATAR: 99.70

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: andrewloppol's chemistry question thread
« Reply #17 on: May 31, 2010, 10:27:46 pm »
0
It's individual bonds that absorb. Go look at Mao's post...

**

Isn't that the lazy man's structural formula? I always thought that structural required all CH bonds to be expanded... In fact all bonds except OH..

But I'm not sure...
« Last Edit: June 01, 2010, 05:02:04 pm by m@tty »
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

kyzoo

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2040
  • Respect: +23
Re: andrewloppol's chemistry question thread
« Reply #18 on: May 31, 2010, 10:51:32 pm »
0
Structural formula is with all the bonds shown

Semi-structural formula is any shortcut method, such as CH3CH2OH.
2009
~ Methods (Non-CAS) [48 --> 49.4]

2010
~ Spesh [50 --> 51.6]
~ Physics [50 --> 50]
~ Chem [43 --> 46.5]
~ English [46 --> 46.2]
~ UMEP Maths [5.0]

2010 ATAR: 99.90
Aggregate 206.8

NOTE: PLEASE CONTACT ME ON EMAIL - [email protected] if you are looking for a swift reply.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: andrewloppol's chemistry question thread
« Reply #19 on: June 01, 2010, 02:47:37 am »
0
Basic questions, but:
With IR spec, is it the bonds or the entire molecules absorbing the infra-red radiation that cause it to vibrate, stretch etc.?

****

It's individual bonds that absorb.

**

Incorrect. Both absorption occur (bonds and molecule). The molecular absorption occur at lower wavenumbers (fingerprint region), where combination of bonds/structures absorb energy. This is why every molecule have different fingerprint regions.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

kakar0t

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
  • Respect: +1
Re: andrewloppol's chemistry question thread
« Reply #20 on: June 05, 2010, 06:32:10 pm »
0
10. A - plot area under peak against concentration
9. not sure

vexx

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3965
  • Respect: +66
Re: andrewloppol's chemistry question thread
« Reply #21 on: June 05, 2010, 06:37:22 pm »
0
Q4.
The equation given is a reduction, so the other has to be an oxidation which is an equation wrote with the 'e' on the right side, from this you can already tell it has to be Fe2+ ---> Fe3+ + e- or else if it were fe3+ it would be reducing.
after that balance the equations, find n(cr2o7 2-), using ratio get mole of iron, then divide the mass given of the salt by the mole, and take away the molar mass of fe, and theres your mass of the other elements.
2010 VCE: psychology | english language | methods cas | further | chemistry | physical ed | uni chemistry || ATAR: 97.40 ||

2011: BSc @ UoM

Y1: biology of cells&organisms | music psychology | biological psychology | secret life of language | creative writing
    || genetics&the evolution of life | biochemistry&molecular biology | techniques of molecular science -.- | mind,brain&behaviour 2

20XX: MEDICINE

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: andrewloppol's chemistry question thread
« Reply #22 on: June 05, 2010, 07:17:39 pm »
0
Yeah but its a case of trial and error no?

Like you get the mass of Fe then you subtract it from the mass of whole thing.

Then you need to find empirical formulas that match.

The only one that does is D.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time