Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 12:28:23 pm

Author Topic: more on oxidation numbers  (Read 595 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
more on oxidation numbers
« on: May 29, 2010, 12:36:37 pm »
0
I don't know why i'm getting these wrong.

. So oxygen is -2. Cl is -1 so K = +9 but doesn't K = +1 so Cl = +7? Which order? How do we know which order?

Similarly O = -2 K = +4 Or K = 1, O = -0.5?
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

monokekie

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 687
  • Respect: +5
Re: more on oxidation numbers
« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2010, 12:46:51 pm »
0
arhh, look at KClO4 this way, K+ and ClO4- =]
well the limit can turn into a threshold..

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: more on oxidation numbers
« Reply #2 on: May 29, 2010, 12:50:45 pm »
0
Tricky.

In the first case, Cl is +7 (double bonded to three oxygens, single bonded to an O-, structure is similar to sulfate and phosphate)

In the second case, the O2 is present as superoxide O2-, and each are -0.5

This draws on knowledge that ionisation energies for valence shells are much lower than ionisation energies for inner shells. From an energy perspective, it is much easier to remove all of the valence shell from Cl than to tap into the inner shell of K (and similarly, oxygen atoms are depleted of electrons because it is very hard to remove the second electron from K)
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: more on oxidation numbers
« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2010, 12:58:02 pm »
0
ah ok. so there is some logic to oxidation numbers.... that is they have some grounding in the real world. So we do before all others assign group 1 their +1 first then movie onto oxygen and such. ok.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time