Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 08, 2025, 04:29:50 pm

Author Topic: subsets of C  (Read 4054 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

enpassant

  • Guest
subsets of C
« on: March 30, 2008, 09:30:17 pm »
0
Find the cartesian equations for (i) |z+i|+|z-i|=1 and (ii) |z+i|-|z-i|=3. :idiot2:
« Last Edit: March 30, 2008, 09:49:38 pm by enpassant »

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Respect: +5
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #1 on: March 30, 2008, 09:37:04 pm »
0
let z= x + yi

[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri

Toothpaste

  • pseudospastic
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1648
  • Member #10
  • Respect: +26
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #2 on: March 30, 2008, 09:49:36 pm »
0
(i)


Substitute z = x+yi into your equation:


Group like terms:




Bring one of the square roots over to the right hand side.


Square both sides - "undo the square roots"


 ... Quadratic expansion on the RHS by the way.


Move it around. Expand and






Square both sides.


Expand.


Expand .






Divide through by 3 to get 1 on the RHS.




See coblin's post for domain.
can't exist because Ahmad says so.







(ii) I didn't show all the steps for this one because when you get the hang of it you'll be able to get to the answer faster.





















« Last Edit: March 30, 2008, 11:10:05 pm by Toothpick »

enpassant

  • Guest
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #3 on: March 30, 2008, 10:45:37 pm »
0
Not making sense!

Toothpaste

  • pseudospastic
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1648
  • Member #10
  • Respect: +26
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2008, 10:46:40 pm »
0
Not making sense!

All of it, or certain bits?

I'll put in annotations to show you what I did.

Collin Li

  • VCE Tutor
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4957
  • Respect: +17
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2008, 10:49:16 pm »
0
Not making sense!

It's just pure algebraic hackwork. There are a few milestones.

1. Change the modulus into the algebraic expression (surds)

Now, we want to simplify the relationship between and :

2. Move one of the surds to the other side so that it is easier to square both sides (which is critical to simplifying the and terms).

Now we can square both sides.

3. One surd will be left over after simplifying. Isolate it and square both sides again.

4. Simplify a final time.

That is the strategy, and that is what Toothpick has done
« Last Edit: March 30, 2008, 10:51:07 pm by coblin »

evaporade

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 111
  • Respect: +1
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2008, 10:56:14 pm »
0
I agree it made no sense. Sketch and see.

Toothpaste

  • pseudospastic
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1648
  • Member #10
  • Respect: +26
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #7 on: March 30, 2008, 10:59:15 pm »
0
I agree it made no sense. Sketch and see.

Ahmad pointed that out too. (part i)

Collin Li

  • VCE Tutor
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4957
  • Respect: +17
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #8 on: March 30, 2008, 11:02:41 pm »
0
I agree it made no sense. Sketch and see.

I haven't checked the working, but I have noticed she hasn't put down any domains and ranges. There are certain restrictions.

From this line of working:

Quote


Since the RHS is negative:



This may be why the function might nominally exist in cartesian form, but may actually not show up, or make sense.
« Last Edit: March 30, 2008, 11:06:45 pm by coblin »

Ahmad

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1296
  • *dreamy sigh*
  • Respect: +15
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #9 on: March 30, 2008, 11:11:52 pm »
0
contradiction.
Mandark: Please, oh please, set me up on a date with that golden-haired angel who graces our undeserving school with her infinite beauty!

The collage of ideas. The music of reason. The poetry of thought. The canvas of logic.


enpassant

  • Guest
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #10 on: March 31, 2008, 08:45:48 am »
0
What do I say for (i) and (ii)?

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #11 on: March 31, 2008, 07:55:55 pm »
0
the algebra ought to be "trusted", but if you need to imagine how it'd look, think of it this way:

means the "distance of any point z from a particular point c"

so going to (i), it basically says "distance from -i + distance from i =1", which cannot make sense, because the minimum distance between i and -i is 2

for  (ii) a bit harder to imagine, "distance from -i - distance from i = 3", or "distance from -i = distance from i + 3", so naturally you have a hyperbola (well, you would think, but it doesnt actually work)
« Last Edit: April 01, 2008, 01:56:54 pm by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

evaporade

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 111
  • Respect: +1
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #12 on: March 31, 2008, 10:10:10 pm »
0
are you sure of (ii)?

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #13 on: April 01, 2008, 12:51:09 pm »
0
=S this is very wierd, i see nothing wrong with toothpick's workings, but:

given

it can be shown that the verticle axis is 3 units long, with its maximum pt at (0,1.5)

so the cartesian coordinate translates to

when we plug this into the original equation:







=S
« Last Edit: April 01, 2008, 12:54:05 pm by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: subsets of C
« Reply #14 on: April 01, 2008, 01:46:28 pm »
0
a not very pedantic proof (nor handwritten)


what I mean to say is:

if is true:


or, the distance from is 3 units more than the distance from

If we were to link and to , then we'd have a triangle, with being the longest edge, and has the same magnitude as

the two smaller sides would have the magnitudes of and 2.

But this is evidently false, as the sum of magnitudes of the smaller sides need to add up to larger than the longest side (or you just have 3 lines enclosing absolutely nothing),

therefore, so long as can be represented on the Argand diagram (), the relation is false
« Last Edit: April 01, 2008, 02:04:01 pm by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015