Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 12:39:23 pm

Author Topic: Correlation forward and reverse  (Read 5048 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Correlation forward and reverse
« on: June 22, 2010, 06:37:08 pm »
0
What information can we get from the reverse reaction when we have all the information of the forward reaction?
E.g. we have =50kJ mol-1, activation energy=150kJ mol-1 enthalpy of reactants 150kJ mol-1 and enthalpy of products 200kJ mol-1

So what can we say about the reverse reaction? Like is the activation energy the same? the same (but negative)? Enthalpy of products and reactants switched around?
« Last Edit: June 23, 2010, 01:56:51 pm by kenhung123 »

vexx

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3965
  • Respect: +66
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2010, 07:15:33 pm »
0
^ you said enthalpy of reactants twice?

but anyway..
the reverse reaction will have different activation energy, if you look at the energy profile diagram for whatever is reacting, you will see that it has either absorbed or emitted energy, and so depending on the products having moved to a higher energy state or lower energy state- there will be a different required activation energy for the reverse reaction (if lower state, more energy required for reverse).. but they can have similar activation energies if the energy diagram shows they are on the same level...

also this reverse reaction will require the opposite amount of energy that it did initially to react (if it was a change of -200kj, then it'll be a change of 200 in reverse).
that answer your question? and also someone correct me if i'm wrong, i read through the first few pages so quickly that i may not have interpreted this section correctly!
« Last Edit: June 22, 2010, 07:17:04 pm by vexx »
2010 VCE: psychology | english language | methods cas | further | chemistry | physical ed | uni chemistry || ATAR: 97.40 ||

2011: BSc @ UoM

Y1: biology of cells&organisms | music psychology | biological psychology | secret life of language | creative writing
    || genetics&the evolution of life | biochemistry&molecular biology | techniques of molecular science -.- | mind,brain&behaviour 2

20XX: MEDICINE

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2010, 08:19:29 pm »
0
Edited, so is there any way we can figure the activation energy of a reverse reaction given all that info about forward reaction?

vexx

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3965
  • Respect: +66
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2010, 09:31:24 pm »
0
yes there is

we have =200kJ mol-1, activation energy=150kJ mol-1 enthalpy of reactants 150kJ mol-1 and enthalpy of products 350kJ mol-1

uhh i haven't learnt this yet, but i think it's not too difficult..
since the change of energy is positive, it means energy was absorbed, 200kj mol-1, and since there was 150kj of activation energy, there would be 200-150=50kj of energy required as activation energy for the products to reverse the reaction..
(can anyone confirm please..?)
2010 VCE: psychology | english language | methods cas | further | chemistry | physical ed | uni chemistry || ATAR: 97.40 ||

2011: BSc @ UoM

Y1: biology of cells&organisms | music psychology | biological psychology | secret life of language | creative writing
    || genetics&the evolution of life | biochemistry&molecular biology | techniques of molecular science -.- | mind,brain&behaviour 2

20XX: MEDICINE

fady_22

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
  • Respect: +5
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #4 on: June 22, 2010, 10:50:31 pm »
0
yes there is

we have =200kJ mol-1, activation energy=150kJ mol-1 enthalpy of reactants 150kJ mol-1 and enthalpy of products 350kJ mol-1

uhh i haven't learnt this yet, but i think it's not too difficult..
since the change of energy is positive, it means energy was absorbed, 200kj mol-1, and since there was 150kj of activation energy, there would be 200-150=50kj of energy required as activation energy for the products to reverse the reaction..
(can anyone confirm please..?)

For an endothermic reaction, I highly doubt that the activation energy is lower than the change in enthalpy.
« Last Edit: June 22, 2010, 10:59:55 pm by fady_22 »
2009: Biology [46]
2010: Literature [44], Chemistry [50], Physics [46], Mathematical Methods CAS [46], Specialist Mathematics [42]

ATAR: 99.70

vexx

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3965
  • Respect: +66
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #5 on: June 22, 2010, 11:35:13 pm »
0
yes there is

we have =200kJ mol-1, activation energy=150kJ mol-1 enthalpy of reactants 150kJ mol-1 and enthalpy of products 350kJ mol-1

uhh i haven't learnt this yet, but i think it's not too difficult..
since the change of energy is positive, it means energy was absorbed, 200kj mol-1, and since there was 150kj of activation energy, there would be 200-150=50kj of energy required as activation energy for the products to reverse the reaction..
(can anyone confirm please..?)

For an endothermic reaction, I highly doubt that the activation energy is lower than the change in enthalpy.

i need someone to confirm, i haven't learnt this yet, nor have i read much on it.. i wanted to have a stab, so someoneeee checkk :3
2010 VCE: psychology | english language | methods cas | further | chemistry | physical ed | uni chemistry || ATAR: 97.40 ||

2011: BSc @ UoM

Y1: biology of cells&organisms | music psychology | biological psychology | secret life of language | creative writing
    || genetics&the evolution of life | biochemistry&molecular biology | techniques of molecular science -.- | mind,brain&behaviour 2

20XX: MEDICINE

Whatlol

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 928
  • Respect: +2
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #6 on: June 23, 2010, 01:26:43 pm »
0
yes there is

we have =200kJ mol-1, activation energy=150kJ mol-1 enthalpy of reactants 150kJ mol-1 and enthalpy of products 350kJ mol-1

uhh i haven't learnt this yet, but i think it's not too difficult..
since the change of energy is positive, it means energy was absorbed, 200kj mol-1, and since there was 150kj of activation energy, there would be 200-150=50kj of energy required as activation energy for the products to reverse the reaction..
(can anyone confirm please..?)

For an endothermic reaction, I highly doubt that the activation energy is lower than the change in enthalpy.

Yea i think that is basically an impossible situation... you cant have activation energy as 150kjmol^-1 and change in chemical energy as 200kjmol^-1
failed uni

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #7 on: June 23, 2010, 02:00:36 pm »
0
I think the activation energy of reverse if like 150-50=100kJ mol-1?

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #8 on: June 23, 2010, 04:49:55 pm »
0
This is really simple with a diagram.

Here is my botched effort at it.

To make things simple you zero the reactants at 0. The delta H is going to be whatever you stiupate it to be then, if its 50 you mark it at 50 if its -374 then you mark it at -374. Similarly, the activation energy is marked at whatever you call it to be. In this case it is 150.

http://img526.imageshack.us/i/diagraml.png/

You are right in saying that the backward reaction has an activation energy of 100. By looking at the diagram and starting from right to left you start at 50, and need to "hike up a hill" of 150. You're already 50 up. So treck a further 100.

Another obvious statement is that the new delta H is -50 as it releases heat.

2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #9 on: June 23, 2010, 06:37:47 pm »
0
Makes a lot of sense now martoman thanks

m@tty

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4324
  • Respect: +33
  • School: Heatherton Christian College
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #10 on: June 23, 2010, 07:17:54 pm »
0
Makes a lot of sense now martoman thanks

Yes, it does, now that you changed the information in the original post.
2009/2010: Mathematical Methods(non-CAS) ; Business Management | English ; Literature - Physics ; Chemistry - Specialist Mathematics ; MUEP Maths

96.85

2011-2015: Bachelor of Aerospace Engineering and Bachelor of Science, Monash University

2015-____: To infinity and beyond.

vexx

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3965
  • Respect: +66
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #11 on: June 23, 2010, 07:20:04 pm »
0
Makes a lot of sense now martoman thanks

Yes, it does, now that you changed the information in the original post.
lol yeah i noticed that..

2010 VCE: psychology | english language | methods cas | further | chemistry | physical ed | uni chemistry || ATAR: 97.40 ||

2011: BSc @ UoM

Y1: biology of cells&organisms | music psychology | biological psychology | secret life of language | creative writing
    || genetics&the evolution of life | biochemistry&molecular biology | techniques of molecular science -.- | mind,brain&behaviour 2

20XX: MEDICINE

kenhung123

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3373
  • Respect: +7
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #12 on: June 23, 2010, 07:28:47 pm »
0
Makes a lot of sense now martoman thanks

Yes, it does, now that you changed the information in the original post.
Yea because it didn't make sense since the products had higher energy than the activation so i reduced it O.o? I was just wondering what I needed to do to find activation energy in reverse reaction
« Last Edit: June 23, 2010, 07:30:55 pm by kenhung123 »

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #13 on: June 25, 2010, 08:08:37 am »
0
Makes a lot of sense now martoman thanks

Yes, it does, now that you changed the information in the original post.
Yea because it didn't make sense since the products had higher energy than the activation so i reduced it O.o? I was just wondering what I needed to do to find activation energy in reverse reaction

Be careful with that. Enthalpy of reactants and products are usually measured on a semi-absolute scale [i.e. measured with respect to some arbitrary zero point]. Change in enthalpy and activation energy are both relative quantities that measure change [relative to the enthalpy of reactants].

The restriction on activation energy is almost negligible: for endothermic reactions, it must be greater than , and in general, it must be positive. It can be as large as you want it to be, and it wouldn't make any difference if it was, say, 10000 kJ/mol
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

iffets12345

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1414
  • Respect: +15
Re: Correlation forward and reverse
« Reply #14 on: June 25, 2010, 10:06:35 pm »
0
I think the activation energy of reverse if like 150-50=100kJ mol-1?

I was thinking this too, is it correct? Since I thougth the reverse reaction would be the graph of the original flipped horizontally, so the energy released in the original becomes activation for the reverse reaction?
Feel free to message on dentistry questions