Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 03:20:10 pm

Author Topic: shadow rate  (Read 748 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
shadow rate
« on: July 12, 2010, 12:21:09 am »
0
A person 2 meters tall is walking away from a streetlight 8 meters high at a rate of 50 cm per second.

At what rate is the length of the person's shadow changing?

So I set up the triangles. i know

i'm calling the length of the shadow L and the distance from the man and the pole x.

Similar triangles being:

Doing the mathy thing:

so

I want and -ve as its getting smaller

So ?!?

Or is this just pain wrong?
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

moekamo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
  • Respect: +4
Re: shadow rate
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2010, 02:16:10 am »
0
the rate of change of distance is in cm, but u have the heights of the man and pole in metres, i think it has something to do with that...
2nd Year BSc/BEng @ Monash

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: shadow rate
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2010, 02:19:12 am »
0
ah god.damn.it is the method right though?
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

moekamo

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
  • Respect: +4
Re: shadow rate
« Reply #3 on: July 12, 2010, 02:42:25 am »
0
yea i think so, do you have the answer?
2nd Year BSc/BEng @ Monash

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: shadow rate
« Reply #4 on: July 12, 2010, 02:44:19 am »
0
nah which is why i'm posting it to verify if what i've done is right. So long as the method stands up to scrutiny. I don't care about the numbers, its the thought processes that matter.  :smitten:
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

kakar0t

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
  • Respect: +1
Re: shadow rate
« Reply #5 on: July 12, 2010, 03:48:26 am »
0
thats what she said :D

ily similar triangles!

Chavi

  • sober since 1992
  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1413
  • "Death to the juice"
  • Respect: +5
Re: shadow rate
« Reply #6 on: July 12, 2010, 10:34:33 am »
0
Firstly, you need to ensure all figures are in the same unit. you can't have dx/dt = 50 in cm, and Dl/dx in meters.

So,  
and the rest is correct:
2009: Math Methods CAS [48]
2010: English [47]|Specialist Maths[44]|Physics[42]|Hebrew[37]|Accounting[48]  atar: 99.80
My blog: http://diasporism.wordpress.com/