« Reply #4 on: July 23, 2010, 09:40:25 pm »
0
Hmm I'm just wondering, why did you put
instead of
We haven't covered Fourier Series yet, but reading ahead in my book that's the formula they give.
Given a fixed value of
I tried the latter formula and got:
}| = 4\ -\ \frac{4}{3}\cos{2x}\ -\ \frac{4}{15}\cos{4x}\ -\ \frac{4}{35}\cos{6x}\ -\ \frac{4}{63}\cos{8x}\ -\ \frac{4}{99}\cos{10x}\ -\ \frac{4}{143}\cos{12x}\ -\ ...)
Fourier analysis is cool
Definately
The only problem is that we do this last, since we do electromagnetism first then optics (I may actually come to love optics). Having said that electromagnetism looks pretty cool too.
With the formula I gave, both forms are equivalent its just my lecture notes use what I put up. In our lecture notes:
 \cos{n\omega t}\,dt)
So I thought that if:

Then:

« Last Edit: July 24, 2010, 10:36:41 am by QuantumJG »

Logged
2008: Finished VCE
2009 - 2011: Bachelor of Science (Mathematical Physics)
2012 - 2014: Master of Science (Applied Mathematics/Mathematical Physics)
2016 - 2018: Master of Engineering (Civil)
Semester 1:[/b] Engineering Mechanics, Fluid Mechanics, Engineering Risk Analysis, Sustainable Infrastructure Engineering
Semester 2:[/b] Earth Processes for Engineering, Engineering Materials, Structural Theory and Design, Systems Modelling and Design