Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 01:14:20 pm

Author Topic: That Neap question  (Read 639 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
That Neap question
« on: August 01, 2010, 06:20:03 pm »
0
The reaction in the test is clearly shown as a one way arrow. It is:



A magnesium ribbon is dropped into a beaker of dilute acid. It shows a graph that steadily increases then tapers off at time T.

In their solutions they say this means that the reaction has reached equilibrium.... but isn't it just that it has completed the forward reaction? So no equilibrium?
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

fady_22

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
  • Respect: +5
Re: That Neap question
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2010, 06:55:30 pm »
0
Yeah, that question annoyed me.
The hydrogen is continually being released, causing there to be a constant net forward reaction. So I said that the reaction went to completion. As there can't be a net backwards reaction (as the hydrogen is released), I don't think you can say that it reached equilibrium.
Stupid NEAP.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2010, 07:02:01 pm by fady_22 »
2009: Biology [46]
2010: Literature [44], Chemistry [50], Physics [46], Mathematical Methods CAS [46], Specialist Mathematics [42]

ATAR: 99.70

Blakhitman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1954
  • Respect: +7
Re: That Neap question
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2010, 08:38:51 pm »
0
The reaction in the test is clearly shown as a one way arrow. It is:



A magnesium ribbon is dropped into a beaker of dilute acid. It shows a graph that steadily increases then tapers off at time T.

In their solutions they say this means that the reaction has reached equilibrium.... but isn't it just that it has completed the forward reaction? So no equilibrium?

THEIR ANSWER IS WRONG!!!!! it has to be.

Besides, pretty sure that reaction is irreversible.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2010, 08:43:55 pm by Blakhitman »

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: That Neap question
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2010, 11:09:13 pm »
0
Who says a complete reaction is not in equilibrium? Equilibrium is defined as when the system stops changing. You can achieve that by equal rates of both forwards and backwards reaction. Both of these rates can be finite (dynamic equilibrium), or zero (complete reaction).

It's just not a very 'orthodox' use of "equilibrium". It's not a good way of describing the situation, but it's not incorrect.
« Last Edit: August 01, 2010, 11:10:46 pm by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015