Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 01:14:19 pm

Author Topic: Le Cheteliar's Graphs  (Read 945 times)  Share 

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

98.40_for_sure

  • vtec's kickin in yo!
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2589
  • Respect: +10
Le Cheteliar's Graphs
« on: July 29, 2010, 10:04:41 pm »
0
Lets assume that the equation is 3A + 2B -> C
And you dilute it with water

Which graph is correct? Is the dilution the same for each concentration line, or do you have to draw them different lengths according to mole ratio?

CHEERS  :knuppel2:
2009: Texts & Traditions (28)
2010: English (45), Chemistry (40), Methods CAS (43), Specialist Maths (42)
ATAR: 98.40

Booksale: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33456.0.html
MM & SM tuition: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33942.0.html

Studyinghard

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1313
  • Respect: +4
Re: Le Cheteliar's Graphs
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2010, 10:19:23 pm »
0
im pretty sure its the second graph. work the with mole ratios
"Your life is like a river, no matter what you just got to keep on going"

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Le Cheteliar's Graphs
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2010, 10:20:47 pm »
0
yeah the second graph.  dilutions should always go further down for higher concentrations.

it is not correct to drop them all by the same amount and apparently examiners don't like it...
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

98.40_for_sure

  • vtec's kickin in yo!
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2589
  • Respect: +10
Re: Le Cheteliar's Graphs
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2010, 10:21:03 pm »
0
From what i've seen in textbooks and notes, they just dilute them all the same

But a few checkpoints questions make a fuss about it, so unsure...
2009: Texts & Traditions (28)
2010: English (45), Chemistry (40), Methods CAS (43), Specialist Maths (42)
ATAR: 98.40

Booksale: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33456.0.html
MM & SM tuition: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33942.0.html

stonecold

  • Victorian
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 5335
  • Respect: +255
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Le Cheteliar's Graphs
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2010, 10:24:28 pm »
0
let me give you a scenario.

-dilute something that is 1.0 M by half, new conc is 0.5 M
-dilute something that is 0.2 M by half, new conc is 0.1 M

see how the higher the initial conc, the more the dilution will drop the conc?
2011-13: BBiomed (Microbiology & Immunology Major) @ UniMelb


VCE 2009'10: English 46 | English Language 49 | Chemistry 50 | Biology 50 | Further Mathematics 48 | Mathematical Methods CAS 39
ATAR: 99.85

"Failure is not when one falls down but rather when one fails to get up" - unknown

98.40_for_sure

  • vtec's kickin in yo!
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2589
  • Respect: +10
Re: Le Cheteliar's Graphs
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2010, 10:27:37 pm »
0
But isn't this mole ratio, not concentration ratio
2009: Texts & Traditions (28)
2010: English (45), Chemistry (40), Methods CAS (43), Specialist Maths (42)
ATAR: 98.40

Booksale: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33456.0.html
MM & SM tuition: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33942.0.html

8039

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 437
  • Respect: +1
Re: Le Cheteliar's Graphs
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2010, 11:10:12 pm »
0
A and B would lower rapidly then slowly reach equilibrium and C would rapidly lower, then slightly rise (not as high as original tho, obviously). Isn't that right?

Is this a time/concentration graph? then yeah lines would be equal length. Reactants on top in any order and product at bottom. The graphs look the same to me?
« Last Edit: August 02, 2010, 11:12:14 pm by 8039 »