How does it make it more difficult to be a pharmacist and support oneself financially? Less competition there makes it easier. Lack of pharmacists there means that you get paid more. It's actually more difficult in the city and suburbs where pharmacy licenses have now become completely saturated and practically the only way to own your own pharmacy is to buy an existing one. Simple economics; low supply (since no one wants to go) and high demand (there's always a demand for health) means more money for pharmacists.
I haven't particularly heard of pharmacists having inadequate equipment as a result of reduced health services. Most of their roles revolve around their dispensing and that mostly involves just the retail stock of drugs which they can easily get in. It's not like pharmacists need MRI machines.
I'd say stick with and expand upon the idea of a pharmacist as a primary health care provider rather than being allied health.
EDIT: For the second point, I guess you could say that since the pharmacist has to now become a primary health care provider as a result of reduced access to other health services, then they cannot perform their other duties as well (dispensing etc.) as a result since they have to allocate the time elsewhere.
so lemme get this straight
i should pretty much talk about
the pharmacists having to become the larger/ more dominant health care provider ... since there will be less healthcare services which means less doctors etc.
umm any ideas how i would elaborate on that for like .... 8 lines? hahah ..
btw
tysm so much for the help man . ur a legend . appreciate it
EDIT : by the way
i meant with the financial thing that.
if there are less health care services .. then its harder for a pharmacist to find a job.
i mean . if their are decreasing pharmacies .. and many pharmacists . then it would be difficult
but nah i know why im wrong .. i understand what ur saying . thanks man .. didnt see it
hmmm any other possible ideas btw?