Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 01:27:54 pm

Author Topic: stating the aim without stating it's the aim  (Read 4464 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Visionz

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Respect: +1
Re: stating the aim without stating it's the aim
« Reply #15 on: September 10, 2010, 02:17:28 pm »
0
I like how at the start of the year people were telling me I'd NEED to know how to write an ERA when we never even did a single one.

sillysmile

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 644
  • :>
  • Respect: +11
Re: stating the aim without stating it's the aim
« Reply #16 on: September 10, 2010, 02:43:04 pm »
0
that sounds sus, I had to do 2 E.R.A sacs, but they were easy.
2010: Biology 37+   Literature 25+    Physical ed 36+   Psychology 44+
ATAR: 80+ and I will be happy.
2011: Psychological science @LaTrobe (bundoora campus)

"Wrinkles should merely indicate where smiles have been"-- Mark Twain

Spreadbury

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 787
  • Respect: +12
Re: stating the aim without stating it's the aim
« Reply #17 on: September 10, 2010, 03:29:30 pm »
0
that sounds sus, I had to do 2 E.R.A sacs, but they were easy.

I think there are a list of sacs that teachers can choose to do.

and visionz knowing how to write an ERA would probably help in the exam considering there's an entire section on research methods.
Bachelor of Laws, Deakin

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
Re: stating the aim without stating it's the aim
« Reply #18 on: September 10, 2010, 03:53:15 pm »
0
Really? It's in the study design that you have to do one at least during Unit 4 as part of research methods.
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.

Visionz

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Respect: +1
Re: stating the aim without stating it's the aim
« Reply #19 on: September 10, 2010, 05:07:26 pm »
0
Really? It's in the study design that you have to do one at least during Unit 4 as part of research methods.

maybe it was just disguised as a test. We do a lot of sacs for all subjects that appear varied but are all pretty much plain old tests. Like for an annotated poster we basically did a filli in the boxes test on an A3 piece of paper. If we get audited we shouldnt have a problem.

We breezed through research investigation, finished that area before the end of term 2 so we'd have more time for memory and learning.

I trust the teacher so I guess thats all that matters. 

Glockmeister

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1660
  • RIP Sweet Nothings.
  • Respect: +8
"this post is more confusing than actual chemistry.... =S" - Mao

[22:07] <robbo> i luv u Glockmeister

<Glockmeister> like the people who like do well academically
<Glockmeister> tend to deny they actually do well
<%Neobeo> sounds like Ahmad0
<@Ahmad0> no
<@Ahmad0> sounds like Neobeo

2007: Mathematical Methods 37; Psychology 38
2008: English 33; Specialist Maths 32 ; Chemistry 38; IT: Applications 42
2009: Bachelor of Behavioural Neuroscience, Monash University.

Visionz

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Respect: +1
Re: stating the aim without stating it's the aim
« Reply #21 on: September 11, 2010, 04:39:28 pm »
0
Never done anything like that.
IIRC correctly it was a thing with like 1 - a, b, c.. 2 - a, b, c.. 3 - a, b.. and all questions were related/consequential. It wasnt a blank piece of paper to start with though.

matt123

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1653
  • Strive.
  • Respect: +6
Re: stating the aim without stating it's the aim
« Reply #22 on: September 11, 2010, 04:41:36 pm »
0
lol really?
ive done 3 ERA this year
and 9 psych sacs so far ull up ... 1 more to go .
2009 : Physical Education
2010  ATAR : 91.45 , Bio , Chem , Methods , Psychology , English
Completed VCE at the age of 16.
2011 : Bachelor of pharmacy
2012 : Hopefully med? " crosses fingers"

minilunchbox

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1001
  • Respect: +6
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: stating the aim without stating it's the aim
« Reply #23 on: September 11, 2010, 07:15:03 pm »
0
lol really?
ive done 3 ERA this year
and 9 psych sacs so far ull up ... 1 more to go .

Yeah, I've done 2 ERAs this year (and 2 last year). Our teacher made us do one in Unit 3 as preparation for Unit 4 because that one's compulsory for the whole state.

Never done anything like that.
IIRC correctly it was a thing with like 1 - a, b, c.. 2 - a, b, c.. 3 - a, b.. and all questions were related/consequential. It wasnt a blank piece of paper to start with though.

That sounds like an ERD.
2011-13: Bachelor of Science (Pharmacology) @ University of Melbourne

Visionz

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1185
  • Respect: +1
Re: stating the aim without stating it's the aim
« Reply #24 on: September 12, 2010, 09:46:58 am »
0
aye I dont know.

We only do one sac for each area of study so ive only done 5 and theres one left this week.