Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 01:03:22 pm

Author Topic: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - States; and Spontaneous Reactions  (Read 1824 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tcg93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Respect: +2
Hi,

We were told at school, when calculating equilibrium constants (not Ka) that you only include species with the main state of the equation. However, after looking through an exam this MCQ answers state otherwise.

Could someone please clear this up for me

(The attached question from an exam says that the answer is D - I picked B, but IF the answer is D then wouldn't C be right too (units weren't asked for))


Also,
why doesn't a +ve EMF always mean a reaction is spontaneous (Q17 - answer A)?
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 05:22:02 pm by tcg93 »
Methods | Specialist | Chemistry | English | UMEP Maths | Cisco | IT Applications

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - states and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #1 on: November 05, 2010, 03:54:27 pm »
0
For the first q, what is the difference between c and d? I don't see any..
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

toshibaj

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 62
  • Respect: 0
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - states and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #2 on: November 05, 2010, 04:00:29 pm »
0
For the first, even if units are asked for, wouldn't C be right? The units cancel out don't they? 
 

98.40_for_sure

  • vtec's kickin in yo!
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2589
  • Respect: +10
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - states and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #3 on: November 05, 2010, 04:41:57 pm »
0
The chemistry teacher at scotch said that putting in units for a K equation would be technically wrong? So based on what he said... it would be C? Can someone clarify this?
2009: Texts & Traditions (28)
2010: English (45), Chemistry (40), Methods CAS (43), Specialist Maths (42)
ATAR: 98.40

Booksale: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33456.0.html
MM & SM tuition: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33942.0.html

Souljette_93

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Respect: +4
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - states and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #4 on: November 05, 2010, 04:51:19 pm »
0
For the first, even if units are asked for, wouldn't C be right? The units cancel out don't they? 
 

Yeah i thought C as well. As far as i know, you have to put units.That's what my teacher said, as well as TSFX i believe.
Ancient Persian Proverb; " I Wept because i had no Shoes, until i saw a man with no feet!"

First they came for the Socialists, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out --
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me -- and there was no one left to speak for me.
-Martin Niemoller, a german pastor

tcg93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Respect: +2
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - states and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #5 on: November 05, 2010, 05:11:18 pm »
0
For the first q, what is the difference between c and d? I don't see any..

hey Mao,

why don't we exclude the water in the equilibrium constant because it is in a different state? - i was told that by my teacher
(there is no diff between C and D)

and also can u explain why Q17 is A?

Cheers
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 05:13:03 pm by tcg93 »
Methods | Specialist | Chemistry | English | UMEP Maths | Cisco | IT Applications

98.40_for_sure

  • vtec's kickin in yo!
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2589
  • Respect: +10
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - States; and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #6 on: November 05, 2010, 06:01:00 pm »
0
Rate of reaction too slow?
2009: Texts & Traditions (28)
2010: English (45), Chemistry (40), Methods CAS (43), Specialist Maths (42)
ATAR: 98.40

Booksale: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33456.0.html
MM & SM tuition: http://vce.atarnotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,33942.0.html

tcg93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Respect: +2
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - States; and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #7 on: November 05, 2010, 06:05:32 pm »
0
Rate of reaction too slow?

Doesn't that mean the reaction is still spontaneous, only it is really slow?
Methods | Specialist | Chemistry | English | UMEP Maths | Cisco | IT Applications

fady_22

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 557
  • Respect: +5
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - States; and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #8 on: November 05, 2010, 06:11:42 pm »
0
For the first q, what is the difference between c and d? I don't see any..

hey Mao,

why don't we exclude the water in the equilibrium constant because it is in a different state? - i was told that by my teacher
(there is no diff between C and D)

and also can u explain why Q17 is A?

Cheers

I think they are going with the definition, which is wrong. It should be which will always be positive in a spontaneous reaction.
2009: Biology [46]
2010: Literature [44], Chemistry [50], Physics [46], Mathematical Methods CAS [46], Specialist Mathematics [42]

ATAR: 99.70

physics

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2397
  • Its anna :D
  • Respect: +65
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - States; and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #9 on: November 05, 2010, 06:14:28 pm »
0
spontaneous just means reactions from chemical-->electircal energy
non-spontaneoue just means that electricity needs to be supplied to start the reaction.
HELP ME GRADUATE!
If you know anyone pregnant let me know :)

My youtube channel:
http://www.youtube.com/Fairytailslilangel

tcg93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Respect: +2
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - States; and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #10 on: November 05, 2010, 06:24:07 pm »
0
spontaneous just means reactions from chemical-->electircal energy
non-spontaneoue just means that electricity needs to be supplied to start the reaction.

so since you're producing electricity for spontaneous, why is the EMF not always +Ve?
Methods | Specialist | Chemistry | English | UMEP Maths | Cisco | IT Applications

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - States; and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #11 on: November 05, 2010, 07:16:12 pm »
0
Q4:

Difficult to deal with. Very difficult to deal with. Strictly speaking K doesn't have a unit (if you are working with 'activity'), but since we're not working with activity, units should be included, always.
Which brings the question, what 'units' does a liquid have?
I think C as the correct answer. liquids have a molar concentration (water has a concentration of ~55M), the square brackets still denote 'concentration', so the unit for this K is unitless.
D is definitely incorrect, since the numerator has the unit M2, the denominator must have the unit M3 to give the M-1 they claim, which is absurd.


Q17

This question is a bit stupid. When EMF is positive, the reaction is
- exothermic
- generates electricity
The EMF and rate will be different if we change the conditions (different conc, etc). Thus all four options are correct.
Ahh I see what they did there.

The reaction may not spontaneously proceed. Exothermic does not always mean spontaneity, this reaction may have a ridiculously large activation energy to start, thus it may not start spontaneously.
« Last Edit: November 05, 2010, 07:18:27 pm by Mao »
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

toshibaj

  • Victorian
  • Forum Regular
  • **
  • Posts: 62
  • Respect: 0
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - States; and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #12 on: November 05, 2010, 08:12:37 pm »
0
Sorry for sounding dumb, but how do we know the reaction is exothermic?

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - States; and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #13 on: November 06, 2010, 01:08:00 pm »
0
Sorry for sounding dumb, but how do we know the reaction is exothermic?

From the EMF. A positive EMF means it is thermodynamically favoured, i.e. exothermic.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Calculating Equilibrium Constants - States; and Spontaneous Reactions
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2010, 02:35:26 pm »
0
Sorry for sounding dumb, but how do we know the reaction is exothermic?

From the EMF. A positive EMF means it is thermodynamically favoured, i.e. exothermic.

lol wut? I was thinking its giving off electricity == heat.
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time