Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 12:30:31 pm

Author Topic: Insight 2008 Question help  (Read 889 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

tcg93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Respect: +2
Insight 2008 Question help
« on: November 09, 2010, 10:05:43 pm »
0
Hi,

Could somebody help me with what I am doing wrong in Question 5c.

I have included my answer and the suggested solution too, although there is an error in the solution as (0.689/2) x 5748 doesn't = 3964 so it wasn't really helpful for me
Methods | Specialist | Chemistry | English | UMEP Maths | Cisco | IT Applications

scocliffe09

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
  • Respect: +46
Re: Insight 2008 Question help
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2010, 10:24:29 pm »
0
the solutions are wrong :) the correct answer is 200.4g i think :)
Just back from spending the year at Oxford. Now onto final year Monash MBBS.

2009: Biology [50], Maths Methods (CAS) [45]
2010: English [50], German [50], Chemistry [50] Monash Uni Chem [5.5]
ATAR: 99.95.

JinXi

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 818
  • Respect: +90
  • School: Camberwell High School
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Insight 2008 Question help
« Reply #2 on: November 09, 2010, 10:28:19 pm »
0
Their Energy required for part a) is wrong I think.
Monash B.Aero Eng/Sci Discontinued in Sem2 2012 [2011-2015]

"I will always choose a lazy person to do a difficult job… because, he will find an easy way to do it." ~ Bill Gates
^ SNORLAX, I chooosee You!!!

samiira

  • Guest
Re: Insight 2008 Question help
« Reply #3 on: November 09, 2010, 10:34:20 pm »
0
yeh the energy that they give in the solutions for part a is wrong.. they wrote (4.0 x 10^6 )/1000
and that should give u 4000 not 10000.. so redo ur working replacing 1.0 x 10^4 with 4000

scocliffe09

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
  • Respect: +46
Re: Insight 2008 Question help
« Reply #4 on: November 09, 2010, 10:36:54 pm »
0
No I think their part a is fine. 10000kJ is right I think.
They just made a calculation error in part c)
Just back from spending the year at Oxford. Now onto final year Monash MBBS.

2009: Biology [50], Maths Methods (CAS) [45]
2010: English [50], German [50], Chemistry [50] Monash Uni Chem [5.5]
ATAR: 99.95.

Martoman

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1476
  • Respect: +11
Re: Insight 2008 Question help
« Reply #5 on: November 09, 2010, 10:37:42 pm »
0
oh gawd why does everyone else's handwriting so freaking like a computer? Am I the only one rocking the cursive/doctor/illegible style any more?
2009: Math methods: 50, Psychology: 44
2010: chem 47, further 48, Spesh 49 fml seriously and other yr 11 subs.
2011: Holidaying, screw school.
No. Not azn.
___________________________________
Swedish meal time all the time

scocliffe09

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 310
  • Respect: +46
Re: Insight 2008 Question help
« Reply #6 on: November 09, 2010, 10:38:28 pm »
0
oh gawd why does everyone else's handwriting so freaking like a computer? Am I the only one rocking the cursive/doctor/illegible style any more?
oh gawd why does everyone else's handwriting so freaking like a computer? Am I the only one rocking the cursive/doctor/illegible style any more?
Don't worry - mine's awful too. Not as bad as Tram's though.
Just back from spending the year at Oxford. Now onto final year Monash MBBS.

2009: Biology [50], Maths Methods (CAS) [45]
2010: English [50], German [50], Chemistry [50] Monash Uni Chem [5.5]
ATAR: 99.95.

samiira

  • Guest
Re: Insight 2008 Question help
« Reply #7 on: November 09, 2010, 10:39:38 pm »
0
oh gawd why does everyone else's handwriting so freaking like a computer? Am I the only one rocking the cursive/doctor/illegible style any more?

haha.. u havent seen my handwritting ;)

JinXi

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 818
  • Respect: +90
  • School: Camberwell High School
  • School Grad Year: 2010
Re: Insight 2008 Question help
« Reply #8 on: November 09, 2010, 10:44:55 pm »
0
They failed. (0.689/2) *5748 does not give 3964...

Got me so confused as to why the 2 methods gave different answer's.

Wonder why they even divided by two and multiplied the enthalpy by two. Other than to stuff up ofc  :(
« Last Edit: November 09, 2010, 10:52:15 pm by JinXi »
Monash B.Aero Eng/Sci Discontinued in Sem2 2012 [2011-2015]

"I will always choose a lazy person to do a difficult job… because, he will find an easy way to do it." ~ Bill Gates
^ SNORLAX, I chooosee You!!!

tcg93

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 234
  • Respect: +2
Re: Insight 2008 Question help
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2010, 07:19:18 am »
0
Thanks guys. I realised they made 2 errors in the solutions.
Methods | Specialist | Chemistry | English | UMEP Maths | Cisco | IT Applications