Chemistry 2010

[crayolé]

OM NOM NOM science  :angel:

so full of win in that movie

FUCK I KNOW YEAH!

I watched it again after chem U4 and I'm like
fusion? WTF
tritium?? pmfg
unsustainable???  I just learnt this shit! LOL
IT ALL MAKES SENSE NOW
My mind was blown..

[stonecold]

You'll be able to tell if somethings wrong. It should be fairly obvious. A contradiction or inconsistency or whatever. Cause if it was a (consistent) numerical error then they would just let it slide and alter the answers (obviously lol)..

I am betting if there is an error, it is on an equilibrium MC question, with two right answers or no right answers or something...

I don't think they'd do anything if there were two correct answers. It still has a chance of testing knowledge (and fooling people) - fulfilling its original purpose. It's more likely that there's no correct answers. Imagine if they didn't pick it up if this is the case.. I can imagine how long I'd spend thinking  wth?  getting stressed and I think it would put me off a bit for the rest of the exam >.<

Yeah, one with no right answers would be most likely.  This would throw me and create unnecessary stress.

If it is an error in Short Answer, then everything will just be fucked...

[Martoman]

this would be good!!!!

[stonecold]

this would be good!!!!

How can an error that results in the % ionisation for ethanoic acid as 53.48% be good

[jto1292]

That would be a fun error

[Martoman]

this would be good!!!!

How can an error that results in the % ionisation for ethanoic acid as 53.48% be good

because we get free marks

[Blakhitman]

this would be good!!!!

How can an error that results in the % ionisation for ethanoic acid as 53.48% be good

because we get free marks

But then everyone does, whereas with no error, you would get the mark and many wouldn't!!