From Today's Age (18/12/2010) [Letters]
Let down by system
PURE shock is all I remember feeling as I read my legal studies result. A 34 is a fine score but doesn't reflect my 60-plus hours of study for the exam; nothing below an A on all my SACs (school assessed coursework) and very positive practice exam results. Then the disappointment and the disbelief sank in.
So I rang the helpline and was greeted by admittedly genuine people who tried to explain the reason for my grade while I cried on the other end of the phone. Although I received an A for unit 3, an A+ for unit 4 and an A on the end-of year-exam, I was marked down due to the lack of consistency between my class's exam grades compared with their SACs, despite the fact that my grades were consistent.
This is simply unjust. How is it logical or fair that I have been punished for the slackness of others? It has left me pondering whether I should worry about passing VCE's adequacy tests, or whether they should be worried about passing mine.
Maria Patrik, Gardenvale
I think she doesn't understand the system. It's not unjust at all, from what I can see she has assumed that when her teacher gave her an A+, it would stay an A+ and be the same as, for example, getting an A+ on the exam. Seccondly, it would be unjust to "[be] punished for the slackness (sic.) of others" but that doesn't happen. The ranking system ensures that if you're good enough an try hard enough then the 'slackness' of others doesn't effect you.
Also, she only got an A on the exam. This can't be changed at all by her cohort. Someone who gets an A on the exam doesn't deserve to get 40+ unless they have absolutely aced all the sacs (which is unlikely and which doesn't appear to have happened here). I think this woman deserved the score she got.