Uni Stuff > Mathematics
one question - spherical polar triple integral with variable change
Mao:
--- Quote from: enwiabe on June 05, 2008, 05:30:03 pm ---Well if you did UMEP in any year up to 2007 you'd actually have done this stuff :P It wasn't examinable, but this stuff was on the course.
--- End quote ---
thank you, i'll just go harass mum because she didnt give birth to me early enough
cheers, :P
enwiabe:
My pleasure :D
cosec(x):
Its not actually on the UMEP course anymore I think, the Melbourne model took what was UMEP and then put it through a linear algebra machine and now its mostly linear algebra, This stuff came from MTH 2010, Multivariable calculus, a second year subject at monash (if you do enhancement you'll do it first semester first year)
humph:
--- Quote from: cosec(x) on June 05, 2008, 10:19:16 pm ---Its not actually on the UMEP course anymore I think, the Melbourne model took what was UMEP and then put it through a linear algebra machine and now its mostly linear algebra, This stuff came from MTH 2010, Multivariable calculus, a second year subject at monash (if you do enhancement you'll do it first semester first year)
--- End quote ---
why would they have that in a second year course? ??? it's pretty easy stuff
oh, and i've seen both and as the variable for the z-axis at various times. there's no set standard.
cosec(x):
its not about the existence of a set standard, its about the relative coolness of each letter, z is the slightly more obscure axes, as is phi the more obscure letter, thus making them equal on a relative coolness scale.
--- Quote from: humphdogg on June 06, 2008, 03:00:27 pm ---
why would they have that in a second year course? ??? it's pretty easy stuff
--- End quote ---
The reason it is second year is because at monash, people who don't do spec. maths do this:
year 1 semester 1, MTH1020 (like specialist)
sem. 2 MTH 1030 (first year maths)
second year MTH 2010, multivariable. It is a second year subject simply due to its time of taking place in a maths major.
Anyway, is any maths "hard" if you do it enough (by that I don't mean prove the Taniyama-Shimura Conjecture maths, just routine, discovered yonks ago and institutionalised maths)
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version