Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

October 21, 2025, 04:06:57 pm

Author Topic: Physics 2009  (Read 2302 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Flaming_Arrow

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
  • Respect: +16
Physics 2009
« on: June 15, 2008, 01:56:07 pm »
0
Does anyone know what the curriculum is next year?
2010: Commerce @ UoM

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Respect: +5
Re: Physics 2009
« Reply #1 on: June 15, 2008, 02:01:51 pm »
0
Same except they're taking out transistors.
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri

Flaming_Arrow

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
  • Respect: +16
Re: Physics 2009
« Reply #2 on: June 15, 2008, 02:14:29 pm »
0
cool thanks
so they arent adding anything new?
2010: Commerce @ UoM

/0

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 4124
  • Respect: +45
Re: Physics 2009
« Reply #3 on: June 15, 2008, 02:23:04 pm »
0
Lol transistors... didn't they add them in a few years ago?

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Respect: +5
Re: Physics 2009
« Reply #4 on: June 15, 2008, 02:25:13 pm »
0
Lol transistors... didn't they add them in a few years ago?
I think so. The results from the exams indicated only a small percentage got them right.
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri

dcc

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1198
  • Respect: +55
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Physics 2009
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2008, 04:05:05 pm »
0
Lol transistors... didn't they add them in a few years ago?
I think so. The results from the exams indicated only a small percentage got them right.

That and the fact that VCE level transistors has absolutely no physics involved whatsoever.  The most physics we learn in VCE electronics is ohms law, we never actually learn about how/why all these things happen, just reading graphs and drawing pretty pictures (which inherently are incorrect anyway).

ed_saifa

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 911
  • Respect: +5
Re: Physics 2009
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2008, 04:07:32 pm »
0
Yeah, apprently the universities wanted vce students to have some knowlege of it because the uni students found it difficult to understand as well.
[IMG]http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/2506/avatarcg3.png[/img]
(\ /)
(0.o)
(><)
/_|_\

"It's not a community effort"
"It's not allowed. Only death is a valid excuse"
"Probably for the first time time this year I was totally flabbergasted by some of the 'absolute junk' I had to correct .... I was going to use 'crap' but that was too kind a word"
"How can you expect to do well when
-you draw a lemon as having two half-cells connected with a salt bridge
-your lemons come with Cu2+ ions built in" - Dwyer
"Why'd you score so bad?!" - Zotos
"Your arguments are seri

iamdan08

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 697
  • VCE Survivor
  • Respect: +7
Re: Physics 2009
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2008, 05:12:41 pm »
0
Yeah electronics for me was very "just accept it because it's true" and recquired very little understanding of why something happens.
2007-08 VCE - Accounting, Texts & Traditions, Methods, Chem, Physics, Lit
         
2011 Bachelor of Biomedicine (Completed) @ The University of Melbourne
2012 Doctor of Medicine (Second Year) @ The University of Melbourne

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: Physics 2009
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2008, 07:50:00 pm »
0
Yeah, apprently the universities wanted vce students to have some knowlege of it because the uni students found it difficult to understand as well.

transistors are understandably hard, but them in VCE is just plainly a JOKE

see the joke in detail: http://vcenotes.com/forum/index.php/topic,3707.0.html

with the level of understanding of electronics in VCE Physics, there is no possible way for VCAA to expect the cohort to learn it properly, so they dumbed it down to a level they thought acceptable
except that level is completely wrong, idiot, and escapes physical principles

:P
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

Flaming_Arrow

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2506
  • Respect: +16
Re: Physics 2009
« Reply #9 on: June 16, 2008, 10:38:33 pm »
0
thanks guys :)
2010: Commerce @ UoM