Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 11:03:00 am

Author Topic: jane1234's chemistry questions!!  (Read 12417 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #60 on: May 26, 2011, 11:54:01 pm »
0
Nah, quite sure concordant = last 3/closest titres.

Do you mean R - NH - R? If so, it's a secondary amine.
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

jane1234

  • Guest
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #61 on: May 26, 2011, 11:55:40 pm »
0
Nah, quite sure concordant = last 3/closest titres.

Do you mean R - NH - R? If so, it's a secondary amine.

So you always use closest three no matter how many you're given?

And the NH in DNA bases, so I guess its R - NH - R :)

tony3272

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 721
  • Hi
  • Respect: +25
  • School: Wantirna College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #62 on: May 26, 2011, 11:57:06 pm »
0
Okay just did Neap 2008:

1. When you have masses of a precipitate as 1.183g 1.137g 1.109g 1.110g and 1.108g, to find the average mass would you take all the values, or just the last three??? The answers say only the last three, but this doesn't even follow the titration +-0.05mL concordant results method. Would VCAA accept it if you used all 5?

2. Is an NH group considered an amine? Even though it only has one H?

Thanks :)
For 1. you don't include the first two because it's evident that the precipitate is not fully dry. I'm unsure as to why it went up from 1.109g to 1.110g though  :-\
2010 : Accounting
2011 : Methods (CAS) | Chemistry  | Physics  | English Language  | Specialist Maths

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash!

tony3272

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 721
  • Hi
  • Respect: +25
  • School: Wantirna College
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #63 on: May 26, 2011, 11:59:40 pm »
0
Also their not titres, they're just precipitates. So the .05 mL rule doesn't apply.
2010 : Accounting
2011 : Methods (CAS) | Chemistry  | Physics  | English Language  | Specialist Maths

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash!

Water

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1136
  • Respect: +116
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #64 on: May 27, 2011, 12:02:29 am »
0
 1.109g 1.110g and 1.108g <<<<<<<<<<< Distortion of Mass could occur because of air weight I'd suspect, or slight machine errors since the mass difference is so little. Otherwise, they are constant.
« Last Edit: May 27, 2011, 12:04:10 am by Water »
About Philosophy

When I see a youth thus engaged,—the study appears to me to be in character, and becoming a man of liberal education, and him who neglects philosophy I regard as an inferior man, who will never aspire to anything great or noble. But if I see him continuing the study in later life, and not leaving off, I should like to beat him - Callicle

Andiio

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
  • Respect: +14
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #65 on: May 27, 2011, 12:14:10 am »
0
Sorry for bringing up the multiplicity issue again, but how do you know exactly when to either add or to multiply the adjacent (n+1) approximated peaks together?

My teacher told us that both would be fine as long as we explain what we did, but hmm..
2010: Chinese SL [43]
2011: English [47] | Mathematical Methods CAS [41]| Specialist Mathematics [38] | Chemistry [40] | Physics [37]
ATAR: 99.55

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #66 on: May 27, 2011, 04:26:20 pm »
0
Ha? You don't need to know about multiplicty and joining peaks for VCE?
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

pi

  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 14348
  • Doctor.
  • Respect: +2376
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #67 on: May 27, 2011, 05:59:37 pm »
0
Ha? You don't need to know about multiplicty and joining peaks for VCE?

Pretty sure thats right

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #68 on: May 27, 2011, 08:07:05 pm »
0
Sorry for bringing up the multiplicity issue again, but how do you know exactly when to either add or to multiply the adjacent (n+1) approximated peaks together?

My teacher told us that both would be fine as long as we explain what we did, but hmm..

Add. In VCE just add them together.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

DannyN

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 103
  • Respect: 0
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #69 on: May 27, 2011, 10:42:35 pm »
0
sigh... i learnt multiplicity this year at tutor... so if we multiplied in the vce exam would it marked as wrong?
2010: Mathematical Methods (CAS)
2011: English | Specialist Mathematics | Physics | Chemistry | Further Mathematics
Biomedicine@UoM

nacho

  • The Thought Police
  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Superstar
  • ******
  • Posts: 2602
  • Respect: +418
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #70 on: May 27, 2011, 10:52:13 pm »
0
na, both are acceptable, and the same answer if there are <6 splits.

vcaa will never ask these q's because different schools teach different methods,
furthermore it's pretty ambiguous with all those little peaks (that when there'd be 5+ peaks)
nothing to worry about
OFFICIAL FORUM RULE #1:
TrueTears is my role model so find your own

2012: BCom/BSc @ Monash
[Majors: Finance, Actuarial Studies, Mathematical Statistics]
[Minors: Psychology/ Statistics]

"Baby, it's only micro when it's soft".
-Bill Gates

Upvote me

Graphite

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 395
  • Respect: +6
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #71 on: May 28, 2011, 12:15:14 am »
0
Yes, add them. In theory, if you have a quaternary carbon with all hydrogen environments different, you don't simply multiply 2 environments. Multiplicity doesn't go as after as having a linear chain with a maximum number of 2 hydrogen environments on each side.

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #72 on: May 28, 2011, 01:41:34 am »
0
Yes, add them. In theory, if you have a quaternary carbon with all hydrogen environments different, you don't simply multiply 2 environments. Multiplicity doesn't go as after as having a linear chain with a maximum number of 2 hydrogen environments on each side.
did you mean tertiary carbon? =)
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015

Graphite

  • Victorian
  • Forum Obsessive
  • ***
  • Posts: 395
  • Respect: +6
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #73 on: May 28, 2011, 08:24:17 am »
0
Quaternary or tertiary, both can potentially have more than 2 non equivalent hydrogen environments :)

Mao

  • CH41RMN
  • Honorary Moderator
  • Great Wonder of ATAR Notes
  • *******
  • Posts: 9181
  • Respect: +390
  • School: Kambrya College
  • School Grad Year: 2008
Re: jane1234's chemistry questions!!
« Reply #74 on: May 28, 2011, 05:12:55 pm »
0
Quaternary or tertiary, both can potentially have more than 2 non equivalent hydrogen environments :)

Nope. Quaternary carbons have 4 C-C bonds, and won't show up in 1H NMR. Tertiary carbons have 3 C-C bonds and 1 C-H.
Editor for ATARNotes Chemistry study guides.

VCE 2008 | Monash BSc (Chem., Appl. Math.) 2009-2011 | UoM BScHon (Chem.) 2012 | UoM PhD (Chem.) 2013-2015