Login

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

November 01, 2025, 12:13:23 pm

Author Topic: Solubility -> Rt  (Read 2522 times)  Share 

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Andiio

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
  • Respect: +14
Solubility -> Rt
« on: April 13, 2011, 07:29:52 pm »
0
Just as a confirmation to whether I'm correct, how does a lower/higher solubility affect the retention time of components?

Thanks!
2010: Chinese SL [43]
2011: English [47] | Mathematical Methods CAS [41]| Specialist Mathematics [38] | Chemistry [40] | Physics [37]
ATAR: 99.55

Bonifacio

  • Guest
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #1 on: April 13, 2011, 07:40:08 pm »
0
If it is soluble in water it is polar and thus if you have a polar stationary phase it will adsorb more strongly to it and increase retention time. If the mobile phase is a polar solvent then obviously the retention time will decrease.

Zien

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 164
  • ~Life is awesome; deal with it~
  • Respect: +2
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2011, 07:42:55 pm »
0
In HPLC, the higher the solubility of the component to the mobile phase (liquid) the shorter the retention time is for that component. In GLC, the higher the solubility of the component to the stationary phase (liquid) the longer the retention time is for that component.
~~VCE~~

2010: Environmental Science (47)
2011: English l LOTE: Japanese Second Language l Chemistry l Mathematical Methods CAS l Physics

2012 (Dream Course): MBBS @ Monash University

Bonifacio

  • Guest
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2011, 07:45:01 pm »
0
What if you have a non-polar liquid Zien?

Zien

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 164
  • ~Life is awesome; deal with it~
  • Respect: +2
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2011, 07:50:25 pm »
0
It'll be the other way round. If the component was non-polar, then you'd use a non-polar solvent so dispersion forces can act to dissolve the component. You wouldn't have a polar component and then use a non-polar solvent. :p
~~VCE~~

2010: Environmental Science (47)
2011: English l LOTE: Japanese Second Language l Chemistry l Mathematical Methods CAS l Physics

2012 (Dream Course): MBBS @ Monash University

Bonifacio

  • Guest
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #5 on: April 13, 2011, 07:52:31 pm »
0
Sounds good to me!

Basically, the important thing to remember with this is that non-polar adsorbs strongly to non-polar and polar adsorbs strongly to polar. After that, size of molecule and functional groups can alter retention time.

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #6 on: April 13, 2011, 07:56:14 pm »
0
Just to confirm my own suspicions, you have to follow the like dissolves like rule for the component and mobile phase, but what about the stationary phase?
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

Andiio

  • Victorian
  • Part of the furniture
  • *****
  • Posts: 1209
  • Respect: +14
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #7 on: April 13, 2011, 07:56:32 pm »
0
In HPLC, the higher the solubility of the component to the mobile phase (liquid) the shorter the retention time is for that component. In GLC, the higher the solubility of the component to the stationary phase (liquid) the longer the retention time is for that component.

Do you think you could explain either of those?

I thought (in GLC) a lower solubility in the stationary phase would yield a lower retention time, and yeah I agree with you on the HPLC one.
2010: Chinese SL [43]
2011: English [47] | Mathematical Methods CAS [41]| Specialist Mathematics [38] | Chemistry [40] | Physics [37]
ATAR: 99.55

Zien

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 164
  • ~Life is awesome; deal with it~
  • Respect: +2
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #8 on: April 13, 2011, 08:12:28 pm »
0
Chromatography is like a tug-of-war between the stationary and liquid phases. No matter how great the solubility/adsorption the component has to any phase, it will eventually be swept by the movement of the mobile phase if nothing else.

Let's say we have two components in a gaseous mixture to be distinguished using GLC: one component is polar (A) and the other component is non-polar (B). Let's also say that the stationary phase (liquid) is also polar. Both components would be swept away by the non-reactive gas (e.g. nitrogen). Since A is polar and the stationary phase is polar, it would dissolve in the stationary liquid phase for some time before being swept away by the nitrogen gas. Then it dissolves in the stationary liquid phase again and continues this cycle until it reaches the detector. B is a non-polar gas, unlikely to be influenced by the stationary liquid. It'll just zip along down the column until it reaches the detector.

The important thing to keep note here is that it repeats this cycle of adsorption and desorption. The more soluble the component is to the stationary phase, the longer the retention time (as it spends longer amounts of time dissolve and not moving).

Just to confirm my own suspicions, you have to follow the like dissolves like rule for the component and mobile phase, but what about the stationary phase?

The stationary phase could be polar as well as the mobile phase being polar in a HPLC. That's when things really start to go wild and we have to go "As a general rule of thumb..". :p
~~VCE~~

2010: Environmental Science (47)
2011: English l LOTE: Japanese Second Language l Chemistry l Mathematical Methods CAS l Physics

2012 (Dream Course): MBBS @ Monash University

Aurelian

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 585
  • Respect: +79
  • School: Melbourne Grammar School
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #9 on: April 13, 2011, 08:19:03 pm »
0
Just to confirm my own suspicions, you have to follow the like dissolves like rule for the component and mobile phase, but what about the stationary phase?

The stationary phase could be polar as well as the mobile phase being polar in a HPLC. That's when things really start to go wild and we have to go "As a general rule of thumb..". :p

I wonder who you're quoting there Zien... Lol.

Just to clarify what Zien's saying there, what he means is yes, you do have to follow the "like dissolves like" rule if you have a polar component and a polar stationary liquid phase (in HPLC), and that if all three things (ie the mobile phase, stationary phase and component) are the same, then as your "general rule of thumb" the polarity of the mobile phase is more influential than that of the stationary phase - ie, if everything is polar or non-polar, then the mobile phase "wins" the tug of war.
VCE 2010-2011:
English | Philosophy | Latin | Chemistry | Physics | Methods | UMEP Philosophy
ATAR: 99.95

2012-2014: BSc (Chemistry/Philosophy) @ UniMelb

Currently taking students for summer chemistry and physics tutoring! PM for details.

Zien

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 164
  • ~Life is awesome; deal with it~
  • Respect: +2
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #10 on: April 13, 2011, 08:26:09 pm »
0
Wrong way round, Aurelian. XD
~~VCE~~

2010: Environmental Science (47)
2011: English l LOTE: Japanese Second Language l Chemistry l Mathematical Methods CAS l Physics

2012 (Dream Course): MBBS @ Monash University

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #11 on: April 13, 2011, 08:53:06 pm »
0
Ok, thanks both of you. Just on a final note, and just to check we are all on the same page, would you care to fill in the following (I made it up myself :P):

Assume we have a (P) Polar Component and a (N) Non Polar Component. What types of phases (Polar/Non-Polar) would be best to use for HPLC and GLC if we wanted:
a) The P component to have the shortest retention time
a) The N component to have the shortest retention time
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

Zien

  • Victorian
  • Trendsetter
  • **
  • Posts: 164
  • ~Life is awesome; deal with it~
  • Respect: +2
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #12 on: April 13, 2011, 08:59:57 pm »
0
(I'm assuming the second part was supposed to be b) XD)

a) HPLC - Polar Mobile (liquid) phase and non-polar stationary phase
    GLC  - Non-polar stationary phase (liquid)

b) HPLC - Non-polar mobile (liquid) phase and polar stationary phase
    GLC  - Polar stationary phase (liquid)

Actually, the issue of choosing solids for HPLC and GLC was something that we didn't go too deep on. Don't take my word on it for sure unless someone who really knows their stuff says that this is generally how they do it. :p I'm not absolutely confident~
~~VCE~~

2010: Environmental Science (47)
2011: English l LOTE: Japanese Second Language l Chemistry l Mathematical Methods CAS l Physics

2012 (Dream Course): MBBS @ Monash University

luken93

  • Victorian
  • ATAR Notes Legend
  • *******
  • Posts: 3060
  • Respect: +114
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #13 on: April 13, 2011, 09:05:05 pm »
0
Yay that's what I got :P

You'd do the same as well for replacing P with Very Polar, and N with Slightly Polar, or is it not the case?
2010: Business Management [47]
2011: English [44]   |   Chemistry [45]  |   Methods [44]   |   Specialist [42]   |   MUEP Chemistry [5.0]   |   ATAR: 99.60
UMAT: 69 | 56 | 82 | = [69 / 98th Percentile]
2012: MBBS I @ Monash

Aurelian

  • Victorian
  • Forum Leader
  • ****
  • Posts: 585
  • Respect: +79
  • School: Melbourne Grammar School
  • School Grad Year: 2011
Re: Solubility -> Rt
« Reply #14 on: April 13, 2011, 09:13:02 pm »
0
Wrong way round, Aurelian. XD

Hmmm was it? I swear she said mobile phase won... actually maybe she said stationary phase won... =|

This is why I don't particularly like "rules of thumb" because you can't derive them deductively from anything... >_>
VCE 2010-2011:
English | Philosophy | Latin | Chemistry | Physics | Methods | UMEP Philosophy
ATAR: 99.95

2012-2014: BSc (Chemistry/Philosophy) @ UniMelb

Currently taking students for summer chemistry and physics tutoring! PM for details.